Talk:Density 21.5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls within the scope of the WikiProject contemporary music, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of contemporary music subjects. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Density 21.5 is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, cleanup, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that aren't covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
	This article is supported by the Compositions task force.

[edit] Headings

This page needs headings. Hyacinth 19:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Too much?

This page, with its wealth of analytical detail, strikes me as inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Better to compress the description, link to the various analytical discussions, or cite them as references. Anyone agree?Cenedi 12:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

It's kind of cool to have a music article with this level and quality of content, more than the traditional track listing and album cover. :-) I think it could be pruned a bit, not sure you can get down by more than 1/3 without mangling the sense. Stan 02:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it's too much at all. If the article was completed with other information the analysis would be one section of a full article and not seem so imposing. I think quality is good. Hyacinth (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, the article would benefit greatly from headings breaking it into sections. That way it wouldn't be a plain block of imposing text. Hyacinth (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)