Talk:Democracy & Nature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion

This article was nominated for deletion on 09 January 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.
Articles for deletion

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 December 2005. The result of the discussion was closed as a farce. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

This article was nominated for deletion on November 18, 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

Contents

[edit] Archived talk

[edit] Stable version

I'm pleased to see that we appear to be editing in a slightly more harmonious manner since the re-write.

There are some things we should all agree on:

  • There does not exist any ownership of this article. (See WP:OWN)
  • There do not exist any special positions with regard to editing. (See WP:VANITY)

There are also some valid concerns expressed right now about Wikipedia:Reliable source. If could proceed in as calm and dispassionate a manner as possible, that would be helpful. And henceforth commenting at all times only on the contributions and not on the contributor would be good, too.

brenneman(t)(c) 02:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talking

Talking is good. So if there's something that anyone thinks could be improved, here's a good spot to make a concise case for it.
brenneman(t)(c) 00:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Content of Journals is not "encyclopedic"??

It is for me rather strange that 'sharek.of Vulkan', thinks that the content of a journal should not be mentioned in an encyclopedic entry. M.M. 02.11.06