Wikipedia:Deletion review/Userbox debates/Archived

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

✘ This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump.

Deletion reviews for userboxes should take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review now.

Shortcut:
WP:DRV/U
Deletion discussions
Deletion today

Deletion yesterday

Articles (by category)

Templates

Images & media

Categories (active)

User categories

Stub types

Redirects

Miscellany

Deletion review
Deletion policy
Process - log - tools

Guide - Admin guide
Purge - edit

Userboxes are sometimes deleted by administrators if there are thought to be valid reasons for their removal from Wikipedia. However, some userboxes may be inappropriately deleted. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Userbox debates considers appeals to restore userboxes that have been deleted. It also considers disputed decisions made in deletion-related fora. Before using the Review, please read Wikipedia:Deletion policy and Wikipedia:Undeletion policy.

Category:User undeletion lists a number of administrators who are prepared to honour good faith requests for the restoration of deleted content to your user space, for example if you want to work up a more encyclopaedic article. This does not require deletion review, you can ask one of them directly (or post a request at the administrators' noticeboard).

[edit] Purpose

  1. Userbox debates Deletion Review is the process to be used by all editors, including administrators, who wish to challenge the outcome of any deletion debate or a speedy deletion unless:
    • They are able to resolve the issue in discussion with the administrator (or other editor) in question (this should be attempted first - courteously invite the deleting admin to take a second look);
    • In the most exceptional cases, posting a message to WP:AN/I may be more appropriate instead. Rapid correctional action can then be taken if the ensuing discussion makes clear it should be.
    • An administrator (or other editor) is correcting a mistake of their own, or has agreed to amend their decision after the kind of discussion mentioned above.
  2. Deletion Review is also to be used if significant new information has come to light since a deletion and the information in the deleted article would be useful to write a new article.
This process should not be used simply because you disagree with a deletion debate's reasoning — but instead if you think the debate was interpreted incorrectly by the closer or have some information pertaining to the debate that did not receive an airing during the AfD debate (perhaps because the information was not available at that time). This page is about process, not about content, although in some cases it may involve reviewing content.

This process is about userboxes, not about people. If you feel that an administrator is routinely deleting userboxes prematurely, or otherwise abusing their powers, please discuss the matter on the user's talk page, or at Wikipedia talk:Administrators.

If you nominate a page here, be sure to make a note on the administrator's user talk page regarding your nomination. A template is available to make this easier:

{{subst:DRVU note|section heading}} ~~~~

Similarly, if you are a administrator and a page you deleted is subsequently undeleted, please don't take it as an attack.

Please take general discussion to the talk page.

Speedy deletions of templates can be done by administrators under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion if the template falls into this category (often referred to as T1): Templates that are divisive and inflammatory.

The following is a proposed T2, but has not become stable: Templates designed for user pages that express personal beliefs, ideologies, ethical convictions, or viewpoints on controversial issues. (as of 15:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC))


Contents



[edit] Archived discussions

See /Archive, /Archive 2, /Archive 3

  • Template:User Church of Christ (keep deleted)
  • Template:User atheist (result undelete)
  • Template:User scientology (result kd)
  • Template:User liberal (result keep deleted, WP:SNOW, massive endorsement)
  • Template:User Hell, Template:User Ideal Dictator, and Template:User Elitist Consensus was to keep User Hell (which has already survived TfD), and undelete and TfD the others. 15:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Review
  • Template:User liberty (result kd, unanimous, WP:SNOW)
  • Template:User chav & Template:User notchav (result kd, unanimous, WP:SNOW)
  • User:CharonX/Userboxes/User christian restored by 27-36 majority, will be relisted at TfD in pre-edit war form. 17:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC) Review
  • Template:User hate (result kept deleted. WP:SNOW. Only nominator for review wanted it undeleted).
  • Template:User Wikicheese-ologist (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User ProIsrael: (result keep deleted, WP:SNOW)
  • Template:User varied sex: (result kept deleted, closed as frivolous challenge)
  • Template:User Triceratops Accident (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User antiuserboxdeletion (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User Darwinist(result kept deleted)
  • User:UBX/Communist (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User No Marxism (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User infidel undeleted.
  • Template:User Sock Puppet and Template:User Puppet Master ... it's complicated discussion
  • Template:User against Saud (result almost unanimous keep deleted)
  • Template:User_Unamerican and others (result nomination delisted early; template kept deleted)
  • Template:User transhumanist and Template:User anti-transhumanist (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User boylover and Template:User girllover (result kept deleted).
  • Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes/Alerts (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User admins ignoring policy (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User Unamerican and others (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User vomit (result kept deleted)
  • Template:User Objectivism / Template:User No Objectivism (result: both kept deleted)
  • Template:User_Thermostat_Bicker (Archive#Template:User_Thermostat_Bicker: undeleted and relisted on TfD)
  • Template:User marriage man-woman (result: kept deleted)
  • Template:User Same Sex Marriage (result: kept deleted)
  • Template:User independent Iraq (result: kept deleted)
  • Template:User antiparty (result: kept deleted)
  • Template:User review (result: kept deleted)
  • Template:User Copyright Nazi (result: kept deleted)
  • User:nathanrdotcom/Userboxes/ABF (result: undeleted)
  • Template: User evol-X (result: kept deleted)
  • Template: User feminist (result: undeleted)
  • Template:User userbox insurgent (result: nomination delisted early without explanation; template kept deleted)
  • Template:User userbox revolution (result: nomination delisted early without explanation; template kept deleted)
  • Template:User marriage man-woman (result: no majority to endorse deletion, no supermajority to overturn; I'm re-creating and taking it to TFD)
  • Template:User opposes ubx screwing (result: kept deleted as protected page)
  • Template:User USA Police State (result)
  • Template:User No Meat (result: recreated as redirect)
  • George W. Bush templates
  • Pseudo-templates Userbox:Anti ACLU, Userbox:Anti UN (result)