Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 9

Camp Arrowhead (Washington) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

The article was deleted because of an expired prod. Not enough notice was given. Please undelete the article and let us have a full discussion. --evrik ^(talk) 22:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Camp Archbald (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

The article was deleted because of an expired prod. Not enough notice was given. Please undelete the article and let us have a full discussion. --evrik ^(talk) 22:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC).

Dan Jacobson (Taiwan) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

I suspect that as the main passtime here is deleting things, you are all just waiting for me to finish translating it whereupon you will delete it, is that correct? Jidanni 00:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy close, gratuitous insults, an article that hasn't been deleted or flagged for deletion. Nothing to see here but an apparent temper tantrum. Corvus cornix 00:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Glad that I can now finish translating in confidence that no sharpshooter is just waiting for the article "to walk out of the (translation) bank loaded (with the most hours expended), for maximal drive-by hit-job pleasure. Jidanni 00:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Josephine Ho (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

Did you check http://www.google.com/search?q=josephine+ho ? Is she not famous? Why won't you put back the article so one can further document how famous she is? Instead you gleefully penalize us by telling us to recreate the article from scratch. How can one remember what was there already?? Jidanni 01:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I see, one can hit the "cache" button above. But still you exact your pleasure of spite by not providing the action=raw article. Jidanni 01:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)