- Chitra Ramanathan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)
Numerous Itemized Notability and Verifiability links provided. More can be added UserChitra (I'm raising this DR on behalf of UserChitra who has not been able to follow the DR instructions. I am not a party to this matter and nothing should be infered by my conduct) Mike33 01:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment/Background I raised this on behalf on UserChitra because she seemed to be tied up in trying to get the Deletion Review to work for her. It was first brought to my attention on 7th July, when UserChitra posted a lenghthy note to Ea/R. On looking at Her User talk page it seems she had tried to post the Deletion Review there. The Afd has been blanked following a m:OTRS ticket, but the AFd is still in the edit history. While not actively encouraged, the nominee (I act as proxy alone) is also the subject of the article. This certainly raises questions of WP:COI. If you check User talk page, Ms Chitra has provided further sources to add to the article and her full explaination for wishing to raise the DR. Mike33 01:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion and keep salted. Valid, unanimous AfD, which has now been blanked per OTRS action but is still in history if anyone feels like reading it. If I understand correctly, (and admittedly it's a challenge because the article and its history are so jumbled), she's a visual artist whose primary point of notability was apparently selling a picture to a hotel. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse Deletion (In my personal capacity as an editor) The whole OTRS episode strikes me as duplicity, and certainly not good faith. Aside from WP:COI concerns, the fact that a similar post to the talk page one was added to a blanked Afd is inexcusable. (albeit perhaps in good faith, but as every artist should know - whiting an old canvass can't really hide what was underneath.) Mike33 03:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse & Salt AfD properly closed; salt due to multiple recreations of the article. Eusebeus 10:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion, AfD process appears to have worked properly. WP:COI issues noted as well and current protection from recreation is similarly endorsed. --Kinu t/c 04:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse everything. UserChitra had the chance to participate in the debate but did not. The brag sheet at User:UserChitra might or might not be usable to create an article that could stay, but I would want some evidence that someone without a major conflict of interest wanted to write that article first, and preferably, a draft of what the article would look like. Mangojuicetalk 18:55, 9 July 2007
I did not wish to create any article. All I requested in the first place was to have the summary page restored so that future users could create pages. UserChitra 22:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
