Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 28
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 28 January 2007
| Bill Madden – New article moved into mainspace as requested – trialsanderrors 22:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
see comments below please ww 22:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC) I am new to Wikipedia. On January 9, my very first and relatively new article, Bill Madden, was nominated for deletion for failing WP:V and WP:MUSIC. I noted in my Keep vote that I would modify the article so that it would prima facie and on its face assert the relevant points in WP:MUSIC specifically, points 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 in the criteria for musicians and ensembles and point 1 in the criteria for composers and lyricists, and fully substantiate as defined in WP:V. Between January 11 and January 15, I re-wrote my article to address these points. Unfortunately, on January 16, my article was deleted. I acknowledge that my article as originally posted was poorly written and in "bad shape". However, I believe that it warranted at least a {{cleanup}} or {{disputed}} tag initially rather than a nomination for delete. As a newbie, I clearly understood the invitation from Wikipedia to be bold and also understood that, although my writing may not be up to par with experienced Wikipedians, that the community would assume good faith in my writing (see Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers). I'm writing to ask that you please reconsider the deletion and consider my undeletion request for the following reasons:
For all of the above noted reasons, I kindly request that you consider my undeletion request and reinstate the most recent version of the Bill Madden article which can be found at the moment at User:Windwall/Bill_Madden. Please note that this version is different than the one that was discussed earlier (before deletion) as this version contains all of the recommended changes. Thank you, Windwall 22:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Potter Puppet Pals – Deletion endorsed – trialsanderrors 00:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
Both Potter Puppet Pals and its creator, Lemon Demon, have been covered by the Boston Globe, establishing notoriety. The least that should happen is a merge of Potter Puppet Pals into Neil Cicierega. JNighthawk 19:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Talk:Long Island Electric Railway – Article created, talk page restored – trialsanderrors 00:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This had a template like the one on Talk:New York and Long Island Traction Company, telling admins "please don't delete this talk page as it contains information relating to the creation of a new article", and it had similar information that I compiled. NE2 18:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Hasbara Fellowships – Copyvio version replaced with new article – trialsanderrors 06:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Out-of-process deletion John Nagle 18:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC) This article was deleted without an AfD or proper use of a copyvio template by "20:48, 9 January 2007 RadioKirk (Talk | contribs) deleted "Hasbara Fellowships" (fails WP:N, WP:COPY)". This left several articles with redlinks. The article had been previously edited by multiple editors over a period of time, and had settled on a brief article with a cited quote of the organization's position statement in the introduction. A copy of the article can be seen here on answers.com, since the Wikipedia copy is now inaccessible until restored. --John Nagle 18:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Princess Charming – Deleted version replaced by sourced article – trialsanderrors 05:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
A newspaper article indicated that the pilot episode of the show will be aired this Monday.[1] and another user created a much better article on its talk page. -Danngarcia 09:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Mywebber.com – Deletion endorsed – Coredesat 04:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
the web site has been release and is a real company —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywebber (talk • contribs)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Score (magazine) – Pre-December 23, 2006 revisions restored and relisted at AfD. – Daniel.Bryant 09:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
Deleted and protected from recreation, apparently without going through the AFD process. This is a major magazine with wide distribution in the United States, and while the article that was deleted consisted of only one line of text, it is expandable. As an admin, I have restored the page, however it appears other steps need to be take to remove the protection, which is why I'm going through this step. 23skidoo 17:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
