Talk:Delusional disorder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Portal |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
|
||||||||
how to fix this?
- Please clarify. What needs fixing? If you know what you want the article to say, just go ahead at the "edit this page" link and fix it.Vicki Rosenzweig 18:41, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Recent edits
The recent reworking of the page to be a copy of the DSM-IV-TR criteria seems a little unnecessary. I don't think the page needs to list the DSM criteria verbatim, largely because there is more than one diagnostic system in the world and many conceptions of the disorder (some of which are included in the referenced listed). A link to the full criteria should be enough. Also, the criteria is not meant to be encyclopedic and reads poorly as an encyclopedia article.
I propose to return the page to something a little simpler and easier to read, keep the references (although with referenced properly, it is not clear where the prevalence information etc is from) and link to the full criteria (e.g. here).
- Vaughan 20:41, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It isn't until item seven that we get the idea that the idea is "unlikely" -- Until then, you're describing someone who is merely passionate about an idea.Scott Adler (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] indicators of a delusion
Yikes, isn't it scary how closely that parallels with religious conviction? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.31.49 (talk) 11:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Post Traumatic Stress Disorder?
This definition appears to be created to be abused. Are people who suffer from an experience that bores or annoys other people "dilusional"? Imagine a liberal psychologist describing a survivor of a terrorist attack, one whose politics he or she disagrees with...Scott Adler (talk) 02:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] conspiracism
This behavior coincides remarkably with conspiracism! I'll look for some RS. Does anyone have any? Johnnyt471 (talk) 00:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] use of medical language regarding mental health
In the article on Delusional Disorder, there is some language that follows a "medical model," e.g. referring to the person with the disorder as "patient" and using a tone that implies a certain derogatory attitude toward the individual with the disorder. It would be more current, and some would say more respectful, to say "individual" rather than "patient."
As for the other issue of overall tone, perhaps one thing that might be helpful is to provide more context for what causes someone with a bizarre idea to become diagnosed with Delusional Disorder. The article hints at the basic premise that a person only develops a disorder when their "symptoms" begin to cause a serious problem for them, interrupting their lives and/or relationships to a degree that is painful for the individual or dangerous to themselves or others. Stating that principle outright could be useful here.
Lastly, a section on treatment would be great. The central issues involved in Delusional Disorder are varied, but can include a severe trauma history, a threatened sense of self (the delusions are, in any case, deeply tied to the individual's sense of self), and possible physiological causes (severe nutritional deficits, specifically those caused by untreated celiac disease, can lead in some cases to psychosis - the Johns Hopkins Gazette, 2.23.04 ran an article entitled "SPH Scientists Find Link Between Digestive Disorder and Schizophrenia"). Given these underlying issues, a referral to a primary care doctor would be advisable, as well as perhaps Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) to help the individual develop increased skills to manage emotions as well as increased mindfulness skills to assist with insight.
ClinicalSocialWork (talk) 18:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC) ClinicalSocialWork
