From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
 Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
|
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
Why is the John Jay Report considered valid? It's findings are completely tainted because it is self-defence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fofe510 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
The John Jay Report is not "actual research" but rather manufactured to affect a legal defense. I propose removing the "contradicted by" for other reasons as well. The John Jay Report preceded the claims in the film, so it has been contradicted by the film, not the other way around. Finally, I hate Catholics. Who on earth could sit in the pew and listen to defenders of a cult of pedophilia? Mahony has equated pedophilia and alcoholism. Such conduct and "defense" shocks reason. I plan to remove the stupid crap that valorizes the church legal defense -- or even acknowledges it as substance to be evaluated -- unless some presents a reasonable case for keeping it. 98.210.156.156 (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
