Talk:Delgamuukw v. British Columbia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-Class) Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. WikiProject Canada / Law / British Columbia (Rated Start-Class) Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is part of the Canadian law WikiProject (Discuss/Join). British Columbia Portal This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join). WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America (Rated start-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there. View comments (edit) Needs equal treatment for First Nation position: The positions and arguments of the provincial and federal governments are given, but not that of the Gitksan plaintiffs.Skookum1 10:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
This article has an assessment summary page.

[edit] Needs equal treatment for First Nation position

The positions and arguments of the provincial and federal governments are given, but not that of the Gitksan plaintiffs.Skookum1 10:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)