Talk:Defeasible reasoning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Epistemology Logic

[edit] ?

This entry, although titled Defeasible Reasoning, says next to nothing about defeasible reasoning. It mentions a few things which are not defeasible reasoning, and that's it. So, in other words, according to the article, it holds that:

Is defeasible reasoning such a broad term? Perhaps some examples are in order.

Since the subject of nonmonotonic logic was approached, how is defeasible reasoning/logic different from / like nonmonotonic logic? It is, for instance, my impression that circumscription, default logic, and autoepistemic logic are all nonmonotonic in nature.