Defense of Schwedt Bridgehead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Defense of Schwedt Bridgehead | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of World War II | |||||||
|
|||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
9th Army Germany | 2nd Belorussian Front Soviet Union | ||||||
Commanders | |||||||
Heinrich Himmler Otto Skorzeny |
Konstantin Rokossovsky | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
Originally a Kampfgruppe, later XI SS Panzer Corps | Deception by 2nd Guards Tank Army, supported by 61st and 49th Armies |
The defence of the Schwedt bridgehead was a German 3rd Panzer Army operation on the Eastern Front during the final months of World War II. German forces, commanded by Otto Skorzeny, were ordered to prepare to conduct a counter-offensive, however they were forced to hold a bridgehead against an expected numerically superior forces of the 2nd Belorussian Front (Marshal Konstantin Rokossovsky) for 31 days. Their position was largely ignored during the Red Army's Cottbus-Potsdam Offensive Operation which breached German defences at Gartz to the north of Schwedt.[1] This was unexpected because it required the Red Amry to cross the Randowbruch Swamp that lay between Oder and Randow rivers.
Contents |
[edit] Background
The Germans feared that the advancing Red Army would cross the frozen Oder at Schwedt, about 60 miles north-east of Berlin on the western bank of Oder. Commander-in-chief of Army Group Vistula Heinrich Himmler was planning a counter-offensive from Schwedt and on January 30, 1945 he ordered SS-Standartenführer Otto Skorzeny to prepare for the offensive.
[edit] Preparations
The rapid advance of the Red Army meant that when Skorzeny set up command post on the right bank of the Oder in Niederkrönig (some three kilometers south east of Schwedt), rather than preparing for a counter-offensive he was forced to order that the first week be spent by the troops of the newly created 11th Army[2] preparing fortified positions while troops were concentrated for the offensive. The position was prepared according to a typical Wehrmacht doctrine some 20km forward of the river, and were reinforced with machine gun nests and reinforced trenches.
Despite ostensibly preparing for an offensive, the 3rd Panzer Army troops, including the X SS Corps, were short of supplies and weapons, lacking heavy machine guns and artillery. Makeshift artillery batteries were made by mounting anti-aircraft guns on trucks. This mobile artillery proved useful in harassing the forces of the Red Army's 61st Army by giving them the impression that the Germans had large artillery batteries. After the ice on the Oder was blown up by pioneers to make crossing more difficult for the advancing Red Army tanks, a similar strategy was employed using guns mounted on river barges. Skorzeny later credited this use of mobile artillery with gaining enough time to sufficiently fortify the bridgehead. The initial troops begun to arrive early in February from the Courland Pocket, and included the 4th Panzer Division, the 32nd and 227th Infantry divisions, and units of the XVI SS Corps, and other SS units.[3]
[edit] Battle at the bridgehead
The first encounter battles were between the screening German infantry, and the "2nd Guards Tank Army, on 28 January, (which) was pouring now like a torrent north of Notec River towards Küstrin"[4] when elements of the 9th Guard Tank Corps probed the positions of Kampfgruppe Voigt (Generalmajor Adolf Voigt) east of Pyritz 18km east of Schwedt. As the 2nd Guards Tank Army turned towards Küstrin, the encounters were between patrols from the German 56th Jeger Regiment (CI Army Corps)and Red Army's 89th Rifle Corps forces on February 1.[5] As of February 5 the number of Red and Polish Armies' forces had grown so that German probes behind enemy lines were no longer possible. Once the 2nd Belorussian Front troops had captured the railway in Bad Schönfliess they received a steady flow of reinforcements by train. However, unbeknown to Skorzeny, the Red Army reinforcements were those belonging to the 61st Army and 1st Polish Army of 1st Belorussian Front's northern flank with orders to bypass Schwedt, and attack in the direction of Eberswalde. They masked the movement of the 2nd Belorussian Front's 49th Army which would attack north of Schwedt. Extensive deception operations, and rapid tempo of advance[6] meant that the German command was largely unaware of the switch in forces, or the true direction of impending assaults, and for much of the time were under the impression they were facing a major armoured thrust while the 2nd Guards Tank Army was replaced in line by the 5th Shock Army, including preparation of 136 T-34 mock-ups.[7] These deception measures were hampered by the previous deception conducted by Zhukov in the final stage of the Vistula-Oder Strategic Offensive Operation.
After fighting to the north of their position, the 9th Army which had replaced the 3rd Panzer Army, had to fall back from the forward defences and on February 7 evacuation of all villages outside the bridgehead began. Two Red Army battalions supported by T-34 tanks conducted a daily reconnaissance in force as this evacuation take place.[8]
On March 3 the 9th Army forces abandoned the Schwedt bridgehead, having fruitlessly awaited the orders for a counter-offensive, and not having witnessed the expected Soviet attack on their positions for over a month, and assumed the new position on the western banks of the Oder.
[edit] Aftermath
The Soviets captured Schwedt on 26 April after the German troops had to withdraw to awaoid encirclement following the commencement of the Cottbus-Potsdam Offensive Operation on the 19 April; by then the city was severely damaged.[9] The commander of the XI SS Panzer Corps later stated that there was no strategic purpose for the defence of the bridgehead, but that it served a tactical defensive role and misled the advancing Soviet armies to believe that the Germans were preparing a counter-offensive.[10]
[edit] 9th Army order of battle (15 April)
The order of battle is largely the same as that of the forces being assembled for the expected offensive although the Army subordinations were changed several times, and comes from Zhukov at the Oder: The Decisive Battle for Berlin by Tony Le Tissier.[11]
- CI Army Corps
- 5th Jäger division
- 606th Infantry division
- 309th "Berlin" Infantry division
- XXXIX Panzer Corps (LVI Panzer Corps)
- 25th Panzergrenadier division
- Müncheberg Panzer division
- XI SS Panzer Corps
- 9th Fallschirmjäger division
- 20th Panzergrenadier division
- 303rd "Döberitz" Infantry division
- 169th Infantry division
- 712th Infantry division
- Kurmark Panzergrenadier division
- V SS Mountain Corps
- 286th Infantry division
- 32nd SS "30. Januar" Panzergrenadier division
- 391st Security division
-
- Frankfurt Fortress troops
- 600th Russiche Infantry division (Russian "volunteers")
[edit] References
- ^ see map p.162, Le Tissier
- ^ p.593, Glantz
- ^ p.584, Glantz
- ^ p.584, Glantz
- ^ p.161, Le Tissier
- ^ pp.527-528, Glantz (1)
- ^ see map on p.530, p.531, Glantz (1)
- ^ p.161, Le Tissier
- ^ Märkische Oderzeitung, "Schwedt war menschenleer", 27. April 2005 address by the mayor of Schwedt in commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War
- ^ Otto Skorzeny: Meine Kommandounternehmen: Krieg ohne Fronten , Limes Verlag, Wiesbaden und München 1977, 3. Aufl., ISBN 3-8090-2100-8
- ^ p.273, Appendix VI
[edit] Sources
- Le Tissier, Tony, Zhukov at the Oder: The Decisive Battle for Berlin, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1996
- Glantz, David M., 1986 Art of War symposium, From the Vistula to the Oder: Soviet Offensive Operations - October 1944 - March 1945, A transcript of Proceedings, Center for Land Warfare, US Army War College, 19-23 Maay 1986
- Glantz (1), David M., Soviet Military Deception in the Second World War, Frank Cass, London, (1989)