Talk:Decipher, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Role-playing games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

The last two edits by 216.170.131.171 seem to be extremely biased. I'd reccommend revert to the last version by 24.131.5.75

I re-edited it, bringing it in-line with known facts and eliminating the bias.

Much better now - good job, and thanks.

[edit] Which Decipher Inc

A quick search for "decipher inc" on Google brings up to companies claiming to be called "Decipher Inc". Although I believe the game manufacturer is definitely the one people will think of most the other should probably be mentioned...

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B2GGGL_enGB177&q=decipher+inc

Well seeing as how none of them even have a page...68.70.149.142 01:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fan Controversy

Although the biased edits last year were certainly out of line, shouldn't there be some reference to the fact that the company has managed to stir up some very vocal ill will in recent years from it's fan base due to a number of perceived dishonesties(?)? (StarkeRealm 00:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC))

If you can find a reliable source for that, then go for it. --Maelwys 00:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)