User talk:DeadEyeArrow/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main   Talk   Archives   Email

For current discussion go here July 2005 - December 2007 | January 2008 - March 10th | March 11th - March 31st

Welcome

∞Who?¿? 05:44, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Butcherbutterfly.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Butcherbutterfly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

AN/I

Can you head over to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Bot?!? and prove you are not a bot? ;) --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 03:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

No

Check other albums of almost any artist. they have future dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motaros (talk • contribs) 15:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Read template:infobox album, you're only supposed to put the earliest release date in the released section of the infobox. But it's not that important. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 15:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Your work on Manegarm

Thanks for adding the last three album pages to the Månegarm album section! Hole in the wall 18:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Summerslam 2007

On your edit of Summerslam, it has been said that Triple H will make his in-ring return, so he will most likely wrestle somone. Although I will leave the article as it is until a match is official.

Keano62871 16:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I missed last night's Raw (cable was out). I knew he was rumored to be returning for awhile. He might be facing someone, but it's very unlikely to be Mike Sanders. It already says he's going to return, leave it like that till we know who he's up against.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 17:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Your decapsing at Jeopardy!

Thanks for trying to improve the Jeopardy! article. I have reverted your edit. "Jeopardy! Round", "Double Jeopardy Round!", "Daily Double", etc. are proper names, and thus are always capitalized. Robert K S 15:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Ah sorry, I was re-editing the pages edited by 24.208.58.194 as they had added capitals to things like "External links" and "Show summaries". Guess I didn't look closely enough to that one.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 21:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Ward Churchill Vandal Revert

Thanks for helping out. In retrospect I guess a paste job would have done the job. But I wanted to make sure that I did not exacerbate the problem. Plus I wanted to see to that the vandalism was reported to admin .Albion moonlight 07:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Well I'm glad to help, but I'm not an admin. It was lucky, I just went to the notice board to report someone else and saw your report. BTW, that notice board is for reporting obvious and persistent vandals. You can usually just undo someone's vandalism yourself at first. But if you want to get an admin's attention for something report it to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 07:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Irishguy's talk page

Can we really go to WP:AIV to block 72.145.221.97 for those edits? What would the reason be, because he/she is a nuisance? Elenseel 03:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I think we can, his first edits fall under silly vandalism. His recent ones are attacks. I don't see any problem. Not to mention they're probably a sock of the last vandal.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 03:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

My User Page!

Thanks for taking care of that spastic so-and-so on my user page! I appreciate it! - IamMarkBlake 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, no prob.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 05:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

You be more Careful

I did post a note on the edit change before I removed a false and non-encyclopedic entry from the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.99.247.70 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 8 August 2007.

Firstly, use the edit summary, it helps people like me who are patrolling to see your intention. Otherwise it looks like an anonymous person is removing a well referenced section, which will usually be considered vandalism. Now, I'm not going to revert your edit, but next time a consensus should be reached in the talk page first before removing a well referenced section.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 07:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

for the revert. Happy editing! --_Hdt83 ^Chat 04:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Was nothing. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 04:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Rafael Nadal talk page

Thanks for fixing my mistakes. Dan the man1983 21:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 21:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Here's a guide to archiving. Help:Archiving a talk page--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 21:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks but ive archived once before,This time i made a mistake somewhere. Dan the man1983 21:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply

No problem at all, probably your user page will probably need to be semi-protected shortlyJForget 22:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Yea, it probably will. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I've made the RFPP request for sp for 6-12 hours.--JForget 23:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. - Philippe | Talk 23:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you two very much.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 23:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, there were three of us... Acalamari protected it at the same time as I did. Can't beat the service around here, huh? - Philippe | Talk 23:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Naw ya can't. Thanks, to all three of ya. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 23:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Masculine

DeadEyeArrow, please do not revert the section risk taking in the article Masculine again. This section violates wiki standards of verfiability, and NPOV, at present and can not be included until those that want it included bring it up to standard. 216.201.33.27 21:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, that section is pretty much NPOV. And that section did have some cites. If you have issue with that section discuss them and give it time. All the while leaving the section in the article so it may be improved. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 23:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

re:Sorry bout the blanking

its no problem :P, using TW, restoring is as easy as three clicks :P.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 08:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. It was gone before I even noticed it. Tayquan^holla_{My work} 06:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey no prob, was nothing. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 06:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Ashridge Business School

Can you tell me please why texts I'd added to two pages: Ashridge and Ashridge Business School, were 'reverted'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.129.219.10 (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Mostly because it sounded like and advertisement for the school and the little bit of info added info wasn't encyclopedic. Also ya broke the template. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wrestlecrap

The guy posting there as "Merle Vincent" is most likely a vandal even though his recent addition to the page made it sound like accurate information. The real Merle Vincent sadly passed away several years ago and it seems that his name is just along the lines of people registering under false names associated with Wrestlecrap to try and get away with vandalism. Definitely take anything this poster says with a huge grain of salt. Thanks again for the help patrolling the page DX927 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Yea I took a quick look at his edit and was pretty certain it was vandalism but since I'm totally unfamiliar with WrestleCrap's history I figured someone else was in a better position to make that judgment.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 23:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

blocked vandal only account

FYI: I just blocked the anonymous account that just vandalized you as a vandal only account.Balloonman 19:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Alright, thanks.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 19:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

JetLover's IP abuser

Hi there. I saw you reverted someone who has been attacking User:JetLover recently [1] If you see similar attacks from a similar IP, please can you add that IP and information to this abuse report? Wikipedia:Abuse reports/bezeq. Thanks — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 23:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn't notice this was a recurring attack on him. If I see anything, I'll absolutely add to the report. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 00:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, the anuser is using dynamic IPs and thus thinks he can get away with murder. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 02:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

you're welcome

and next time it happens, feel free to use {{subst:vangel}} to thank someone in future :) — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 03:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! -- I am someone who is bored at work 10:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC) That works, then! :-)

Desinicize

Good grief. lol. Trust me, you probably don't want to get in the middle of it, . It is this big POV pushing issue, and edit-warring that's been going on unchecked for 3+ weeks, and I finally reported it, and now they are having to make names to create these articles, because they can't edit war as anons anymore. I'm sorry you kinda got sucked into it lol. ^Ariel♥Gold 11:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I figured as much. Just wanted to bring to the attention of those that are dealing with it. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 11:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Help!

This user keeps removing the tags we placed on his non-English article. I've warned him again... but what if he can't read the warning? What to do next?!--Endless Dan 14:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Consider his edits to Enosis Neon Paralimni FC I'm pretty certain he understands english. The article he keeps recreating is a copyvio anyways. Just keep up with the warnings and csd till he gets the message or blocked. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 14:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Excellent

Your attention to vandalism at Lamborghini was swift and commendable! Cuddlyable3 18:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 18:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Tim Vickers 00:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 00:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Not vandalism

What I was doing to the Hoagie wiki was not vandalism, I was trying to clean UP the vandilism. Tabor 01:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

I never accused you of vandalism, only 72.224.51.163. Take a look at the edit history. When you did this: diff, you removed only some of the vandalism. Then 72.224.51.163 vandalized again, diff, which I reverted to your version which still had some vandalism in it. I didn't notice there was still vandalism in it at the time. I've gone ahead and reverted it to the version before all the vandalism began. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 01:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh okay, I do apologize then...I guess it was the way I read it, I read it wrong. Thank you for helping clean it up!Tabor 01:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

No prob, it happens. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 01:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for your help in combatting vandalism 77.248.185.43 03:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 03:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Comments

Hi Arrow. Am I allowed to delete comments that I wrote? I could not find any rules saying that I cannot any delete comments that I wrote. Thanks in advance for your help. HistoricDST 05:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

There's no rule against it but if your comments where replied to and discussed on, it's better practice to add "<s>" before and "</s>" after (which just strikes through them) your comments. When you did it anonymously I reverted it because I suspected someone was removing maliciously. I apologize, I didn't assume good faith. You can read up more on WP:TALK. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 05:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Smile:)

BTW, you are a good vandal fighter:) I have noticed you here a lot since I cam back this month. You have even beaten me to vandalism:( Have a nice day and keep up your good work here!--SJP 06:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, thanks, you've beaten me to a bunch as well. I just try to do my best. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 06:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The more you fight vandalism, the more accurate and faster you get. If you look back in my talk page archives, you will see that I only started to become great at vandal fighting in May. Before that I was not too good. Keep on trying hard and you will get better, and better. Salaam.--SJP 06:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Maria Eleonora of Brandenburg

Hi! I've just remowed some text from this article, and you asked for a reason; i asure you, it was not ment as vandalism! The text i remowed is from a previous version of the article, and does'nt really fit in with the current version, which was a total wrewright of the entire article (as you can se on the articles history); the information is, i think, in the new version, and i just thought it looked messy with two versions of the same article on the same page. But perhaps you are right; the information i remowed should perhaps not be removed, but only be inserted in the rest of the article, if indeed the information isn't in the new version! Perhaps you would like to insert the text in question, so it would look better? It is well written, though from two different writers! Best wishes!--85.226.235.233 11:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

No go right ahead. I should have took a closer look at the edits in the first place. It was my mistake. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 11:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

re:thanks

Its no problem eh :), that vandal was way over due a ban.(also thanks for the similes, I think there really cute )--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 12:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

That he was, thanks again. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 12:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Milk-maid

She seems like she is going to be a problem child, what with her pointy reversions and redirects. So I posted the situation at WP:ANI. Just wanted to let you know. Jeffpw 13:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I'm not much of an arguer, mostly stick to simple vandalism. Not used to it I guess. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 13:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Sergei Nilus

Good work in spotting and defending against VANDALISM!!!

Much appreciated!!!

Thanks. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 15:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome, was no problem. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 15:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

"Thank you"

"Thank you", "You're welcome". "Thank you too!" "You're very welcome!" Thought I'd shorthand it, lol. Thanks for the revert, and you're welcome for mine, hee hee. ^Ariel♥Gold 16:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

What a way to start the day, a persistent user attack I say. And so the good fight goes on. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 16:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

No probs

you're welcome ^_^ those silly vandals OMGsplosion 21:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

User talk:212.219.92.98

Has just vandalised again, and, how come you seem to be beating me to reverts? Keep up the good work. Meateater 09:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. My secret is using WP:TW on firefox and WP:VF externally. They work well together. Also the insomnia and having no life help. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 09:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

That's cheating! It's far more rewarding to hunt down vandals and then strike, almost like hunting only nothing gets killed...Meateater 11:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

It's not cheating. It's the same thing as a hunter sitting in a box all day waiting for that one prey to walk by. Cept, it's not one prey, it's a damn stampede and I gotta pick out the bad ones. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 12:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Damn vandals...Meateater 07:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Kurt Angle

Did you bother to actually check what i removed? It was just advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.65.12 (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I apologize, it is mostly an advertisement. Next time use the edit summary to explain your reasoning, otherwise it's hard for someone patrolling to discern the intent of an edit. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 06:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about the mishap

Sorry for any inconvenience caused. I am a recent changes patrollor and I only change thing that may be suspicious to a vandal.

I will take more care next time. Sorry again for any troubles. Aflumpire 10:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

What's mine, is yours

And replied more on my talk page. ^Ariel♥Gold 08:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee, "Man up the colors" Also, feel free to use User:ArielGold/Toolbox if you want, which was modified from Fuhghettaboutit's. ^Ariel♥Gold 08:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

New thingie

If I say I like your thingie do you think that will be taken wrong? (P.S. That really is funny!) ^Ariel♥Gold 17:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, it'll be taken as wrong as possible as it is to be funny. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 18:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Mario Lemieux

Not sure where you got the idea that Mario Lemieux wasn't on the 2004 World Cup team, but if you want some proof, here's a picture of him holding the trophy.-Wafulz 23:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

That is the World Cup of Hockey not the World Championship. They are two different tournaments. I didn't say he wasn't on the 2004 World Cup team. He was on that team and they won. But The World Cup isn't part of the criteria for the Triple Gold Club. It's a Stanley Cup, an IIHF World Championship and a Olympic Gold. He never won a world championship. Hence he isn't part of the Triple Gold Club. He only was on a World Championship team once in 1985, where he got a silver.

You know I just read a CBC article an hour ago that called him a "Triple Gold" member. Why I didn't link that to you, I have no idea.-Wafulz 01:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Well I'm wrong about the Triple Gold, but I definitely read an (incorrect) news piece saying Lemieux was part of the club.-Wafulz 02:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah, it's alright. I thought he was too until someone asked why he wasn't on the Triple Gold Club list, on that talk page. So I looked into it and found he wasn't supposed to be. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 02:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: My AfD

My fault there. You are correct. I've since deleted the offending articles. Thanks for letting me know. -- Longhair\^talk 10:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you!  — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 15:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Can that guy hold a grudge or what. I mean get over it. What's the point of continually attacking someone? --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 16:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I just wish someone would take those reports and contact his ISP. I would, but I'd rather someone independent do it, so there's no hint that it's a bad faith report (even though the evidence is pretty damning) — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 16:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee

You know, I meant to fix that, I fixed it on the userpage, but for some reason I forgot about it on the talk page. So thanks! (And of course I don't mind, lol) ^Ariel♥Gold 16:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for watching out for vandals. Your restore of my userpage is much appreciated! --- Stephen Goldmeier | Profile | Talk | (._.) | 07:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Under Satanæ

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Under Satanæ, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.metalunderground.com/bands/details.cfm?bandid=342. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 15:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Project Quickilver

• The "Project Quicksilver" was restored because it was originally deleted for a false reason. I explain how this happened on the article's talk page. Go see it. -- Voldemore (talk) 21:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)