User talk:DCNanney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, DCNanney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 14:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edits to Markos Moulitsas Zúniga

Thank you for experimenting with the page Markos Moulitsas Zúniga on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 04:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 07:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 05:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia articles. Thanks. Guettarda 05:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guettarda 23:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Repeatedly adding false information to a Wikipedia article is vandalism. Guettarda 00:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
DCNanney, might I suggest that if you have source of:
1. "kos" saying that he supports socialist ideas or causes.
2. Markos supporting an organization (with a strong link, not just a casual association) that claims to support socialist causes.
3. Markos belonging to a socialist organization (socialist based on the group's own admission, not by non-credible critics),
that you might be able to add the word socialist. Otherwise, your claim does not meet the Wikipedia policies of WP:VERIFY or WP:CITE. I hope this helps your understanding or Wikipedia policies. Thanks. Ufwuct 02:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 02:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments about AIAV report

I have made comments regarding this issue at User_talk:Chairlunchdinner#User:DCNanney_and_the_report_to_WP:AIAV. -- Deville (Talk) 15:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

After looking at this situation more carefully, let me give you my input. I didn't agree with Chairlunchdinner that you were committing vandalism and so I took you off of report. However, please do not infer that to mean that I think your edits are kosher.
It's pretty clear that you're adding information to these articles repeatedly without resolving the discussion on the talk page. This is highly frowned-upon in Wikipedia; it is a Bad Thing. The burden of proof is on you to show that your edits have merit. From the fact that you are obviously allayed against several other editors -- some of whom are long-time contributors to the encyclopedia -- it is clear your new information is controversial. Moreover, it's a pretty good bet from what I've seen that some of your edits don't fall in line with WP:NPOV. Finally, you should have a source your changes. In particular, see WP:V and WP:NPOV, these are core requirements for any edit in Wikipedia to stand. Also, since you keep adding the same informtion to the same articles, please review WP:3RR, if you revert too much, you can certainly be blocked for that no matter how right you think your edits are.
In summary, if you have a point to make or a new perspective on these articles, please do not keep adding the same information to the articles. It's simply not going to stay there very long. Please have a discussion on the talk pages of the appropriate articles and try and get some support for your changes there. If you can't convince the other editors that what you're saying is sourced and accurate, then it's a good bet that it shouldn't be in the article in the first place.
Hope this helps. Please feel free to reply here or on my talk page if you have any questions or comments. -- Deville (Talk) 15:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unsourced addition to Markos Moulitsas Zúniga

Your recent contribution to the Wikipedia article Markos Moulitsas Zúniga is very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in Markos Moulitsas Zúniga? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits this article. Thanks!

—chair lunch dinner™ talk 19:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to this article. Guettarda 22:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 14:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)