Talk:DC offset

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would NOT merge this article with DC coefficiant. offset applies largely to waveforms and audio, it should stay it's own.

Agreed. It would be difficult to reconcile the expanded mathematical definition of the DC coefficient with the pure electronics concept of the DC offset. I vote against the merge. Matt B. 09:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what the problem is. Both articles are small and describe essentially the same thing, albeit in different contexts. Also, both articles are small; if there were significant information that would only apply to one and not the other, I wouldn't want a merge. But right now, that's not the case. - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DC

the last paragraph states "if the offset stays constant". it does. that is the definition of DC offset. anything else is just low or very low frequency components. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.33.11 (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

What causes DC Offset? Can this be included? Ahefner 05:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)