Talk:DC-UK
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within The Sega Project | |
 |
This magazine is supported by the Wikiproject Sega. | |
|
Sega Project To-do List:
|
||
[edit] Standard Future Publishing magazine running order?
"At launch, DC-UK changed the standard Future Publishing games magazine running order of news - previews - features - reviews - tips - letters." I have many Future magazines, and other publishers, and they have not always had their content arranged this way. Perhaps this running order might not be associated with Future at all as other publishers had arranged their content this way long before. Nreive 12:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- I worked at Future Publishing for three years and can confirm that the news - previews - features - reviews - tips - letters running order is, by and large, an accurate reflection of how most of its games magazines were ordered during the time I was there. Liveinpeas 23:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ah, but what three years were you working there? Future has been publishing since 1985 and has not always had its games magzines in this running order. So you can't say that it was the "standard games magazine running order". -- Nreive 08:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
