User talk:DblHelixFelix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Warnings
[edit] January 2008
Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to July 5, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 06:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mary Louise Hancock
Hi, I've never met her, but I work at the office (now called Energy and Planning) where she had been the director, so several of the old-timers knew her. Regarding the article, I just have an interest in things related to New Hampshire, so I have a large watch list; I added this article because of her connection to where I work. Thanks for putting it up. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hillary Rodham Clinton. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. szyslak 04:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
