User talk:Dayewalker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my page, and go Celtics! Leave a message for me below, and I'll respond.

Contents

[edit] Nice try Palmer...

But they'll delete this one pretty quick. Somebody will make up ChrisWalker though, and tat whill b uh funi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.205.201.50 (talk) 01:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. Please explain. Dayewalker (talk) 01:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

::How about you stop talking to yourself, huh? --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

So let me get this straight. This guy attacks me, then you, then I try and defend both of us and now you're tagging ME as the sock, and not him? I'll tell you this, every single edit I've made has been a good one, including plenty of vandalism reversions of this IP guy who appears to be climbing up your ass from all angles. If you don't want help with that, fine, I'll defend myself but I won't help you anymore. Good luck. Dayewalker (talk) 20:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

::::So you're telling me it's just a coincidence that the first four letters in this username coincide with letters 2-5 in this banned user's name? I don't think so. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] When UAA deletes you, it'll be sweet.

Enjoy your trolling for the next 5-10 minutes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.205.201.50 (talk) 01:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me? You haven't made a single good edit, but you're attacking me and calling me a troll? What have I done to you? Dayewalker (talk) 01:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Protected

With all this sock activity, I just semi-protected your talk page (and several articles) temporarily. If you would rather have your page un-protected, just let me know. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Same thing, different day. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Impersonating another Wikipedian...

Though that person is banned, your name could be construed as impersonating another editor. I am reporting you to AIV and we'll see what they think. 68.29.133.117 (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not impersonating a banned user in any way, shape, or form. A Checkuser has proven I have no connection whatsoever to that editor.
Since this is your first edit (and that editor has been banned for quite a while), I'm just going to assume that you are that user returning to make personal attacks again, as you did on my page above under another IP. It's awfully egotistical of you to assume that there's only one person in the world who has "Daye" as a part of their name.
As I said above, please leave me alone. Dayewalker (talk) 18:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jefferson National Expansion Memorial

Edit by a banned user is not the only excuse for deleting relevant material. Per this revert, the information is relevant to the article, but it needs referencing. I see no valid reason for deleting this information. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

As per wikipedia policy, "Any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves. As the banned user Hdayejr is not authorized to make those edits, there is no need to discuss them prior to reversion." This user has been banned, and has a laundry list of sockpuppets used to harrass legitimate wikipedia editors over the last few months. I saw his edit, and wiped it off the books as policy dicattates.
Of course, if you'd like to add it, as a wikipedia editor in good standing, go right ahead. That's your call. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know the history of the offender and the banning. But the arch was definitely closed following 911 and so the edit was legitimate. It of course needs a source. Unfortunately I don't have the time I used to have to dog it down. Americasroof (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Two suggestions

Hey there Dayewalker. A couple of friendly suggestions:

First, if you think you've spotted a Hdayejr sock, report it to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/User:Hdayejr immediately so you've got something to point to when you revert edits.

Second, heh, have you considered changing your username? Obviously you don't have to, and if you like this username, feel free to fight for it. I just thought it might give you a chance to edit in peace without this jerk stalking you everywhere :D Your call, of course.

Thanks, and best of luck! --Jaysweet (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Will do. Most of the time, the Hdayejr IPs only run for a little while. And he was the one who attacked me first, for daring to have the same last name as him, I guess. He took offense to my user name since I guess he thought he was the only person in the world named "Daye", and had never seen the Blade movies. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good :) BTW, an admin had close Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/User:Hdayejr, but I created a new one based on today's little lovely mess, which is at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hdayejr (2nd). --Jaysweet (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conversations

The conversation had already ended very well. Adding the alphabet soup detracted from the resolution, rather than adding anything. Things can stop without formal proclamations, simply because all parties realize that what was necessary was done. --Blechnic (talk) 22:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

FWIW, I thought Dayewalker was right to remind us all of WP:DENY. In fact, WP:DENY, IMO, is the main reason why I shouldn't have made the comment in question. --Jaysweet (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, I over-react to getting alphabet soup spewed at me, I'll admit. Anyway, you did right, why don't we make this a positive and you edit some of my articles, and I'll edit some of yours (yours as in anything you're particularly interested in having an extra edit on)? I recently did an overhaul of Fumarase deficiency for horrendous bias, the new version could use a major check. How about both of you go for it? --Blechnic (talk) 22:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I had edit conflicted on my last post, so it's quite possible that it all ended before I could get my post on the page. We all know what's going on, so apologies if I stepped in too late. No hard feelings from me, certainly, and I hope you guys feel the same. I'd be glad to help edit on Fumarase deficiency, if only I knew what the Hell it was. I can check it for punctuation, plurals, and the word "poop," but anything past that point is probably beyond me. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 22:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
You don't need to know anything technically because the technical aspect of the article appears to have been written by a geneticist. It's a bit too high level. It just needs reviewed for biases. The level of bias that smacks you in the face, nothing subtle. But it's hard to catch everything while you're doing the editing, and that is what needs a second set of eyes, or third. Thanks. --Blechnic (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Day's catch

Hehe, I just noticed the revert with no reason as to why it occured, then noticed the IP was within the range used by our Grand Sock Master.— DædαlusT@lk / Improve\ Contribs 04:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)