User talk:Dawn Bard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Dawn Bard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  IZAK 06:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for improvement tags!

Thanks for improvement tags, references, sources, links were added. Cleanup as well! Natkersh (talk) 06:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for fixing Perpetua

There was a vulgar comment on the page, but it wouldn't show up on the "edit page" settings. So I blanked it, with the intention of unblanking it a few seconds later to see if it would work. It did, but then when I checked the history, it said you unblanked it. I don't know how vandalism can be inserted without it appearing in the "edit page". Anyhow, thanks for fixing it.--192.160.64.49 19:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for looking out for Concordia, Kansas

Thank you for taking care of the vandalism on the Concordia, Kansas page.--Paul McDonald 18:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD comments

From an edit summary of one of your edits in an AfD discussion:

removing my own comment that doesn't apply anymore - the user signed the comments

He did not. I did it for him. Apparently SineBot missed this one. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 22:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Hmmm, I don't know why I gave that user the benefit of the doubt - thanks for catching that one, Blanchardb. --Dawn bard (talk) 13:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stein Industries, Inc.

What are you looking for when you patrol articles? I've listed Stein Industries, Inc. as a speedy deletion candidate under db-corp because there are no claims nor evidence of notability. Corvus cornixtalk 19:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

  • I often will tag an article like that as unsourced and of unclear notability, then check back to see if the author adds anything. But you're right, this one is really a good candidate for deletion. --Dawn bard (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Windfall Elimination Provision

You originally tagged this article as unsourced and uncontexted. I updated the intro as well as expand upon the article greatly. Originally I put up a RFC on whether or not to remove the context tag, but there have been no responses in about 48 hours. Please review the article and see if you would be willing to remove the context tag. KV(Talk) 13:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you KV(Talk) 15:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New articles

Do all articles need citations or resources? My page was about a creative idea for a game which would then be the basis of research.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Personjerry (talk • contribs)

[edit] Mark Lowry

I've noticed that you tagged this article for notability. I'm going to respectfully disagree. As the co-host of the Bill Gaither Homecoming shows and a member of the Gaither Vocal Band, Mark Lowry most certainly meets the requirements for notability. And this is without regard to any of his other accomplishments which would further meet the requirements.

I will agree with your tag for needing citations and sources but I only had the same source that the original page (Mark Lowry) was cut and pasted from. Hopefully somebody can come along and clean this up and provide other sources.

I am going to delete your notability tag. However, if you still feel that you are justified I will not get into an edit war with you over it. James084 (talk) 18:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

  • No, I think you're right, and I might have been too hasty in tagging it. I won't add the tag back. --Dawn bard (talk) 18:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Shapiro

hi there, i was wondering what you feel needs to be changed on that page I just created. it is about an engineer that has gotten lots of press recently with his work (yep, me). I linked to artists I am associated with. I think I am as relavant (spelling) as "Mark Goodwin" for example... who is linked to one of the bands I link to... and his page is an ad for the drums he plays, and nothing else. Any help would be greatly appreciated... as it is still a work in progress (i hope) Thanks a bunch, and happy holidays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.100.182 (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] AfD nomination of Germanic New Medicine

An article that you have been involved in editing, Germanic New Medicine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germanic New Medicine. Thank you. --Homer Landskirty (talk) 18:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] How to cite sources, and The Question of "Notability"

I recently wrote up the article on Docta Buddah, keeping it as neutral and professional as I could. I understand the need for cited sources, but I'm unfamiliar with how to do that. Please show me how to follow through on that if you can.

Then there's the "Notability" deal... He's certainly not on the national level, but here in Roanoke, we're a rather isolated major city, so everything is primarily inward-looking. Most people all over the nation haven't even heard of Roanoke, so would Roanoke itself not be notable? He's fairly known within the city's hip-hop music community (which I'm not even a part of myself, as I'm a highly discriminating metal-lover). So I do want to offer a challenge on the Notability aspect. Other than that, I still want to do everything as legitimately as possible. Thanks. Ƿōdenhelm (talk) 07:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

Hi, this is Creamy3. I would like to apologize for being a jerk when I vandalized your page the other day. You were just trying to help me out with some of my contributions and I acted like a complete a-hole. Please forgive me by writing back, maybe we can be friends. User:Creamy3 (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
The Definitive Collection (Deadstar album)
Yahoo! Directory
Nephropathy
Chris Rea (album)
Tennis (album)
Cool (aesthetic)
Dyspraxia
Wired to the Moon
Veba Vs Grand Central
Humpers
Blender (magazine)
Ballads (REO Speedwagon album)
Pro-Pain
Wilferd Madelung
Halo 3
Pushover EP
Don't Be Happy... Just Worry
Echolalia
Divine Invitation
Cleanup
Pick and roll
Humayun Ahmed
Number of the Beast
Merge
Experiential education
Culture of the Philippines
Mercury poisoning
Add Sources
KWID
Duel Jewel
Emily Robison
Wikify
Gaither Vocal Band
Michael McClure
Service Level Agreement
Expand
Distraction
Polymer
Cognitive therapy

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mary Lee LaBay

Hey,

Your marked the Mary Lee LaBay page for notability, but the notability section states: 'There is no present agreement on how high a book must fall on Amazon's sales rank listing (in the "product details" section for a book's listing) in order to provide evidence of its notability, vel non.' her book did make it to #2 on Amazon, which has to count for something.

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.89.87.18 (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sometimes I

Hi.

You have marked this artical for deleation. Can I ask why exactly? It is a genuine music release and all the information on the page is a fact, backed up by the link on the page that I provided, so please can you let me know what else needs adding to the artical to stop it being deleated?

Thanks, Grrrreg (talk) 10:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fruita Mansana

User:ArnoldZippo has got a bad case of ownership on this article, and continues to remove all improvement templates, etc. without comment. Could you take a look at the history here and see whether I'm over-reacting? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:InaneTwit

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article User talk:InaneTwit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Chūō Line Rapid page blanking revert

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Chūō Line Rapid: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 15:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stripper Friends

The person who added "NEW ALBUM!" to that article... that was vandalism, not an unreferenced tidbit. I've since reverted it. Lady Galaxy 23:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] rollback

Hello Dawn bard.
I have noticed that you revert a lot of vandalism. Have you heard of rollback before? It allows a user to revert vandalism much faster than by undo-ing it. I think you should ask for it. I am not an admin, or I would give it to you myself. I wrote this just to let you know about the existence of rollback because before someone randomly gave it to me, I did not know it existed. If you ask for it, you should have no problem getting it, as you clearly have an excellent grasp of what constitutes vandalism. Good luck, and may the vandals fail... J.delanoygabsadds 18:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dr.Nissanka Wijeyeratne of Sri Lanka

Hi Dawn Bard,

All services done by Dr. Nissanka Wijeyeratne to Anuradhapura had been saved in Government Agent's Official Diary, G.A.'s office, Anuradhapura,Sri Lanka & other services are saved in the Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Sri Lanka. If you need any clarification regarding his services you may go through them. I assure that all details that I have included are correct.

Fitz Mackins —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fitz Mackins (talk • contribs) 02:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dr.Nissanka Wijeyeratne of Sri Lanka

Hi Nitraven,

copy to: Dawn Bard,

Below I have pointed what you needed to clarify about Dr.N.W.

1. Education

profound, which led to his popular nickname, "Walking Encyclopaedia".

In his English Poem Book article published by prof. Carlo Fonseka's article " He should be sent to Prison " & on his speech made by him on 14th June 2001 at Russian Cultural centre, Colombo 7, & article on same book by, Dr.Oswald Gomis,Dr.A.T Ariyaratne,Mr.Anura Bandaranaike & Mr.Christy Weeramantri ref. 'Ape Appachchi' Dr.NW English Poem Book

2.Emblem & National Flag of Sri Lanka

As Secretary of Cultural Affairs, Ministry of Cultural Affairs,Sri Lanka. in 1972 he headed the Emblem designed committee & his hand written notes about it are saved in ^ Department of National Archives of Sri Lanka.

Before 1972 The national Flag had 4 spear heads (called 'banku kakul' ) instead of that Dr. Wijeyeratne introduced 4 Bo Leaves so as to reflect Mettha, Karuna, Upeksha & Muditha. This too his handwritten notes are saved in ref. Department of National Archives of Sri Lanka

3.Political Career

Open University & Ruhunu University was established by Dr. Wijeyeratne & Mediacl Faculty for Jaffna University & transformed Vidyalankara & Vidyodya Pirivena's as kelaniya & Sri Jayawaradenapura Universities - all had been done when he was Minister of Higher Education Government Of Sri Lanka. ref. Ministry of Higher Education Colombo 7. Sri Lanka.

President Colleges all over the island too was done by as Minister of Education.- Ref. Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka

Meditation Board concept - as Miniaster of Justice.- ref. Ministry of Justice, Colombo 12, Sri Lanka.

Introduced the Sanghadhikarana Act on behalf of Buddhists - as Miniaster of Justice, ref. Ministry of Justice and gazzetted Kandy Sacred Area - as Minister of Justice & Unesco Affairs

His contributions for Anuradhapura - Ref. Government Agent's Official Diary, Kachcheri Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka.

As Secretary Cultural Affairs establishing Polonnaruwa Sacred Area and Aluvihare Sacred Area. ref. Ministry Cultural Affairs, Sri Lanka.

Dr.Wijeyeratne also established the Sri Lanka Cultural Triangle with aid from UNESCO, and the Central Cultural Fund for preservation of National Heritage Sites in Sri Lanka. - as Minister of Justice & Unesco Affiars & Executive Board Member, UNESCO, Paris.

4. Sri Dalada Maligawa had been managed for the longest period by the Wijeyeratne family, who have served the post of Diyawadana Nilame of the Sri Dalada Maligawa for 30 years. - 1975 - 2005

5. A Friend of the Minorities

A. Muslims of Sri Lanka. The title of Quaid-e Millath was bestowed on Dr. Wijeyeratne at the International Muslim Conference ref. Fort Nightly Review on May 16th 1991, issue No. 17, published by Law & Society Trust, 3 Kynsey Terrace, Colombo 8,Sri Lanka.

B. A Friend of the Minorities full article written by Dr. Oswald Gomis published in Dr. Wijeyratne's ref. 'Ape Appachchi' Dr.NW English poem book & Sri Lanka Daily News 11th June 2007.

6.Family

A. Neranjan Wijeyeratne (ex Basnayake Nilame of Lankatilaka Vishnu Devale - Election held 1981 by Commissioner of Buddhist Affairs, ref. Department of Buddhist Affairs,Colombo,Sri Lanka.)

B.Anuradha Dullewe Wijeyeratne (ex Acting Diyawadana Nilame - appointed by Commissioner of Buddhist Affairs - Ref. Department of Buddhist Affairs,Colombo, Sri Lanka.)

C.Mano Wijeyeratne (Plantation Services Miniaster under the President D.B. Wijetunga's Government in 1993 - Ref. Presidential Secretariat, Sri Lanka.)

I have supplied all info. which you had needed & which I confirm that all are true & correct.

Thanks & kind regards,

Fitz Mackins —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fitz Mackins (talk • contribs) 03:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What are you on about?

Why do i keep getting vandalism messages if I've never vandalised anything!? I haven't even edited wikipedia over the past few days yet I've got about 4 warnings. 212.120.248.142 (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Are you contributing from a shared IP? Because someone from your IP made these edits. If you would like to contribute without being mistaken for a vandal, creating an account is probably your best bet. Please don't hesitate to ask again if you have any more questions. Welcome to Wikipedia. Dawn bard (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
    • What's a shared IP and how do I know if i have one? Also with regards to creating an account, I have tried a few time but it never works. For some reason as soon as I log out I can never log back in; it tells me i entered the wrong password and this can't be as I also tried creating a new account and using cop/paste to enter my password when creating the account and then when logging in. Still when logging in it tells me i entered the wrong password. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.120.248.142 (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • A shared IP is usually a school and company network or proxy server. There is a lot of good info on the Why create an account page. I'm afraid that I'm useless on the technical difficulties, but Wikipedia has a good Technical FAQ page here. Again, don't hesitate to leave another note here if you have questions. Cheers! Dawn bard (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
    • It doesn't even have to be a school or company network. Most people connected from home have a shared IP that might change every so often, such as if they're off-line for a while or there's a service outage. Unless your ISP gives you a fixed IP address and has you configure your computer to use it, you're using a dynamic IP and at any given time you can be using one that someone else was using just the day before. To the original poster: unless you create an account, Wikipedia knows you by the IP address your connection is coming from and if you're not the same person who connected using that IP address last time, Wikipedia has no way to know that. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sheesh!

Why do some people like that 204.102.100.187 user like to vandalize the same page so much? DarkZorro 17:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Loneliness, maybe? I seriously have no idea. Annoying, though, isn't it? Dawn bard (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warning

Dawn bard, I'm wondering why the links I contributed are being considered 'spam'. They are of much better quality than Discogs or Musicbrainz (which are linked heavily on Wikipedia). For example, one page that you reverted Laura Veirs was linking to [1] which provides information you can't find anywhere else on this artist. I would like a rationale on why they it was reverted. Thanks! Mimecuvalo (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Please see the response I left on your talk page. Cheers, Dawn bard (talk) 02:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the clarification, Dawn bard. So, would it be helpful to try to standardize music pages - add Discogs, Musicbrainz, TRHT links? I've looked at a lot of the artist pages and they seem fairly inconsistent in the data that they present. Mimecuvalo (talk) 03:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] a shiny

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting hundreds of vandalisms, Dawn bard is awarded this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Congratulations, and may the vandals fail... J.delanoygabsadds 16:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KKK...

No, I know it is unclear. I said its unclear because the intro of the paragraph is not written well. I'm saying don't rewrite that paragraph but where the problem lies.


GordonUS (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FAR nomination

Ku Klux Klan has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 23:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 76.19.17.91

Vandalbot has already tattled on him at AIV. He's dead already. HalfShadow (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I've already reported him

He's a dead man typing. HalfShadow (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Long Road To Life

Why is Long Road To Life up for deletion. Broadway91 (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

ya its got over a 100 views, very notable!!--YooTuba (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad you see it my way. Broadway91 (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

...for reverting the vandalism on my user page.
--Badgernet (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem - I was just retuning the favour, really - You reverted vandlism to my user page first, so thanks for that! Dawn bard (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ditto :) --Badgernet (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Psychosis

Hi Dawn bard. Can you please let me know why you reverted my citation on the History section. Thanks Rockyar88 (talk) 11:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Rocky, I'm sorry, I should have explained this in the edit summary. It just looked, I don't know, strange - "Our lives in 2014, a Recovery vision from people with experience of mental illness" kind of sounds like you might be citing personal experience or original research or something. Is it a book? An article? Maybe that could be make more clear in the citation. You are, of course, free to add it back - I won't revert it again, and you can see if anyone else questions it. Let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers, --Dawn bard (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers Dawn, and thanks for the feedback on my citation. Perhaps I'll explain more in the citation, or I might further add to the page itself. Yes it is a booklet and it was produced with the assistance of the Mental Health Commission here in NZ, and was in fact written as a collaboration between many people who had experienced mental illness. Cheers, and thanks again. Rockyar88 (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Meade13

You seem to have made a mistake in warning User Talk:Meade13 for an article he did not edit (which you may want to correct). I had already given him a level4 for his repeated vandalizing of Global Warming. Please report him to AIV if he persists, to alert admins. Thanks. -- Alexf42 15:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Yup, that was my mistake, and it has been reverted. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 15:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
No prob. It was just a heads up. -- Alexf42 15:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage.

It's appreciated. Ziggy Sawdust 20:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Best Action?

I see you reverted some edits done to the page on the band Glass Casket. I had changed the article because the initial link to Glass Casket is dead. I am new here, so I may not be familiar with best practices. If this is the wrong way to go about communication, or if you can offer suggestions or point me in the right direction, all the better. Thank you!

Split (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks, Dawn Bard, for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Cheers, JNW (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shenanigans

I believe the IP was trying to draw your attention to a rather substantial deletion out of that article, which gave at least the impression of uncharacteristic vandalism on your part. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I know - I made a mistake on that edit and didn't catch it in time to self-revert, and the fact that the IP was making a point of drawing attention to my mistake here made me grumpy. Happens sometimes. --Dawn Bard (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!Catgut (talk) 22:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How I wish I was in Sherbrook now!

God damn them all! I was told we’d cruise the seas for American gold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.148.169 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please consider also warning vandals

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. Could you also please consider using our vandal warning system [2]? First offenses get a "test1," then a "test2," followed by a "test3" and "test4." At the end of this, if the vandal persists, he or she merits blocking for a period of time. If you do this, it will greatly help us in decreasing vandalism on Wikipedia. Much thanks, -- Kukini háblame aquí 15:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] recent report of vandalism (pro-choice article)

Hello, please see my discussion on the reverts that you made to my contributions to the pro-choice article. I wrote the section entitled "On Pro-choice article & Pro-life article" in the pro-choice discussion page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.89.72 (talk) 18:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Narcissistic Personality Disorder Page

Sorry, I thought the link I added was far better of a resource than the second one that is on the page still under external links. If you don't think it is a valuable page that is ok. Let me know, I think it is a worthwhile one to add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.198.144 (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edits made by 151.200.199.2

Hi, I reviewed the edits made by user 151.200.199.2 and I believe that they were good-faith edits for ADHD and Learning disabilities articles. The point you have tried to make that it was vandalism is false, as you may see here. It is the "world's leading website on learning disabilities and ADHD," according to the website's description. I reverted the edits. If there are any questions, discuss it on my talk page. Also, I strongly encourage you to read this. Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm not going to change your edit, but I stand by my assertion that this isn't an appropriate external link, and 151.200.199.2 made it look like they were spamming by adding it to more than one article. The assertion that "world's leading website on learning disabilities and ADHD" is meaningless, because they don't define what data they use to back it up. The site has a lot of information, but it is also a commercial site, with a whole host of products for sale. If I have further concerns about that link, I will discuss them at the ADHD/LD article talk pages, so that other interested parties can see the discussion. Also, if you had bothered to check my contributions, you would know that I already have a good grasp of what is and what isn't vandalism, in spite of our difference of opinion on one particular edit. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh, ok. I see. Perhaps the description of the link was "over-worded?" Prowikipedians (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)