User talk:Dawlatzai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not Beh-nam. No checkuser has proven this."


Decline reason: "I blocked you. I'm a checkuser. Happy? — Alison 06:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "No, I'm still very upset at being blocked in the first place. Please tell me why Thatcher31 banned? I just want to make sure that know why, because it is ridiculous. Dawlatzai (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "Abusing multiple accounts is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, therefore you have been blocked to prohibit you from continuing to violate policy. — MBisanz talk 06:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

... and we're all utterly tired of you guys filing checkuser requests against each other. It's ridiculous and it's wasting everyone's time - Alison 06:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "MBisanz, before I was unjustly blocked, I never even once used a sockpuppet. Please look at why I was blocked and you'll realize I shouldn't even be banned in the first place. Dawlatzai (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "You were originally blocked for abusing sockpuppets, and proxying for a banned editor, hence I feel that the block was just. — Stwalkerstertalk ] 21:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was never banned for using sockpuppets. Look at my case more carefully. I did not proxy for anyone, I was accused of it by an admin after I reported his friend for sockpuppetery, he banned me to get rid of me. Dawlatzai (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "This is an incredible waste of time... -- lucasbfr talk 23:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.