User talk:Davidhorman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
Welcome, Davidhorman!
Hello, Davidhorman, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Fun stuff...
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 17:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Evolution
Hi. I've reverted the edit you just made to Evolution - please don't make silly edits to real pages. If you want to test, use the sandbox. Thanks. Robin Johnson (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see the silly edit that User:Robin Johnson saw. I believe you fixed a grammatical error. I have restored your changes. Joelito (talk) 13:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- I believe so too - thanks for that latest update too, which should convince the reverters to leave it alone. David 14:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bearded Woman
Nice work on the Jennifer Miller photo. I'm hoping to get a better one with my DLSR this summer. --David Shankbone 17:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mr Sin
Thanks for your recent contribution to List_of_Doctor_Who_henchmen#Mr_Sin ([1], [2]). While I appreciate your intent was to improve the article, I'm afraid your edits were reverted — when writing character histories, plot summaries and the like, we use the continuous present tense, as per Wikipedia's guidelines for writing about fiction. As such, if you find such an article written in the past tense, the appropriate thing to do is to convert it to the present tense. Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 10:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sunshine
Thanks for your occasional collaboration at Sunshine (2007 film)! I'm sad to say that even though I wrote these big ol' Cast Production sections, I have yet to see the film. I've kept my eyes off the Plot section for the most part, and I want to write a fuller Critical reaction section (something like Road to Perdition#Reception) when I finally see the film. I'd like to see about compressing the Plot section a little more (at least creating fuller paragraphs) and explaining the lead section to reflect the whole article. I think that with these changes, it should be nominated as a Good Article. What do you think? (Also, another question -- why do you not leave a linked signature?) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Charybdis 1997.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Charybdis 1997.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)