User talk:David Graham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Bus bbt 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bus bbt 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lancashire United image

Thankyou so much for uploading the image of the SpotOn Lancashire United bus. However, can you please quickly fill in the details on it's Image Page so that it is kept on Wikipedia and not deleted. Cheers, Lradrama 14:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bus bbt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bus bbt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lancashire United article unreferenced material

Hi

I see you've reverted the "unreferenced" tags I added to the article on Lancashire United, but have still failed to cite your sources for the vast majority of your work there. What's your problem with doing so?? Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia of verifiable information, not a bus enthusiats' website full of irrelevant detail like the fact that the B7Rs were Volvo Demonstrators - what does this have to do with LUL? Also if you can't even get the numbers "spot-on" (!) then they shouldn't be in the article. You must surely have access to an official fleet list - so cite it! (or remove the clearly unsourced info.)

Don't get me wrong, the article now looks much, much better than it did previously, but still very little of it is proven fact, and this is not what Wikipedia is about.

I'm sure that myself and others will work with you to get the article sorted, but you need to stop appearing to take umbridge when others criticise your work and add things like "unreferenced" tags.149.254.200.220 (talk) 07:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


Hello. :-) I hope you don't mind me butting in, but, although your contributions to the Lancashire United article are really, really brilliant and they are very much valued (I was the only main contributer to the article before you arrived and I'm very pleased with what you have done), I would however like to emphasise the importance of putting references into the article. This proves to readers that the article is a reliable source of information. What with all the facts and figures in the article, it needs backup. Do you know of any reliable / official websites that provide information on Lancashire United and its fleet? We've considered handbooks, but they rapidly become out of date. I've suggested to LUT that they put an enthusiasts section on their website, but they haven't done so. Can you please help us out? Many, many thanks, Lradrama 11:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Keighley & District route 65

Hi - I was just wondering why you've removed reference to route 65 in the Keighley and district article. It's not a frequent service but runs as pften as some of the other routes listed. Cheers --Deerfold (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)