User talk:Daveyboy16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Horner may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Dave horner
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please read WP:BIO, WP:AUTO & WP:VANITY regarding the creation of autobiographical articles. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- in the banner to respond.
For a quick overview of Wikipedia's policies, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. You can still create other articles about encyclopedic subjects. If you can't think of a subject, you can check the recent requests or improve an existing article.
-- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you feel you can present a case well enough, use WP:Deletion Review to appeal the speedy deletion. However, as far as I can see you have very little grounds to do this on. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:735643200 l.jpg listed for deletion
A tag has been placed on Matthew Marshall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 11:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gay, you will be blocked from editing. delldot talk 14:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for the apology. I'm sure you'll be careful to log out from now on! Peace, delldot talk 14:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Geek, you will be blocked from editing. Newtman (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to High School Musical, you will be blocked from editing. Newtman (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Since you have said that this account has been compromised by a vandal, I have blocked it for an indefinite amount of time. Please change your password and use the {{unblock}} template when the account has been properly secured. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mother worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Chewbacca has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 09:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Dave Horner
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Dave Horner, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 09:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Dave Horner
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Dave Horner, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dave Horner. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Booglamay (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)