User talk:Davejblair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Davejblair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --SueHay 03:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Strategy toolkit
Strategy toolkit has been nominated for deletion, because it is a redirect which redirects to itself. Corvus cornix 04:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spam in Strategic toolkit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Strategic toolkit, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Strategic toolkit is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Strategic toolkit, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please don't remove a speedy deletion tag from an article you yourself has written. An admin will review your reasons for keeping the article after having reviewed the deletion nomination. Corvus cornix 18:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spam in Strategic analysis
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Strategic analysis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Strategic analysis is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Strategic analysis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re. Strategic toolkit
Hi dear Dave! well, first of all, let me welcome you aboard, even tho your first editing experience hasn't been very nice. There were doubts about the notability and verifiability of the artcile, which were expressed accurately at the Talk page. In order to illustrate this to you, I've temporarily recreated the discussion User:Phaedriel/Strategic toolkit here. My suggestion: read our guidelines at WP:CORP, WP:OR and WP:V, and try to rewrite your article in compliance with these policies. Citing a good number of reliable, third party references will help. If I can assist you in the task, please let me know. Best regards, Phaedriel - 01:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gravelly Hill Interchange
I've removed the Google Earth screenshot from this article. Unfortunately screenshots are copyright, and Wikipedia's strict "fair use" policy prevents it from being used except in special circumstances, e.g. to illustrate the article on Google Earth. The same also applies to Spaghetti Junction. – Tivedshambo (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Spaghetti junction birmingham.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Spaghetti junction birmingham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful (but see my comment above first). However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)