User talk:Dave6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: We, Wikipedians, dislike fragmented discussions. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Archives |
Contents |
[edit] hi guys
i see youve redirected the clairsentience article.... let me ask....what was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anyway....you should have told me t get lost out of here...... what was the point of it all? why did i listen to you ? at all? why did i remove all personal references? why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail ? why did i edit and re edit for style and content ? why did i make additional references to religios , anthropological ,socialogical , philosophical ,medical , physics , chemistry , botany , mental health etc so that all views were included and respected? why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort. your actions are without integrity or honour .....
[edit] clairsentience article redirect ?
Hi ..... whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect ... can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period...... .........i could delete this clairvoyance article.... but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl......
..... i hope you can respect the clairsentience article...
..... ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example..... so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it....
[edit] Comment left by 122.167.3.91
[edit] Kaveri issue
I am improving the article by providing facts. Yes they are unbalanced because that it what is happening all these years .So all the injustice done is general and what u say will improve the article is it? Karnataka is hurt from 5 decades.What about that?Come and see the districts of Karnataka and TN . See which is favoured and why?
Then u will know.
--Left by IP contributor at 01:21, 6 March 2007. (Moved from User page by Penwhale)
[edit] About that IP vandal
Thank you for reverting the pages that IP did to User talk:Cuyler91093/Archive 4. I see you reported him or her at WP:AIV, and I added my point. Again, thank you! — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 09:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] San Jose Task Force Invite
Please note that this task force is still unofficial, and I would like to have at least five members before asking for approval from WP:HOCKEY.
[edit] Disambiguation pages
I have removed your addition of PokerStars to the page Star (disambiguation). Please see the guideline Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Partial title matches. Disambiguation pages are meant to be navigational aids only — to direct users to the article they might have been looking for. Thus, dab pages should only link to articles which might reasonably have the same title as the disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages are not intended to introduce users to topics they weren't looking for, and in the case of articles about websites or businesses, this kind of entry could be seen as spamming. — Swpbt & c 13:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)