User:David Fuchs/usr/ub/recall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My Recall process

[edit] RfA

As an admin in Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria, I will stand for a new RfA if at least three editors of good standing[1] voice their concerns about my conduct/actions to me. The RfA will be the same as a normal one, except that it will be for the reconfirmation of my status. The 'crat who closes my RfA will inform me of the descision; if I have 'passed' the RfA, I keep my priveleges; if I "did not succeed" in the RfA, I will voluntarily give up my sysop buttons.

[edit] RfC

If a Request for Comment is opened and a consensus emerges that I should have my sysop status reconsidered, I will stand for another RfA in the manner stated above.

[edit] Voluntary

If an ArbCom case or RfC demonstrates that a significant portion[2] of the community has lost faith in my actions, I will stand for RfA again. If the matter is serious and urgent, I will give up my sysop status first, and stand for RfA when the ArbCom case has been considered, et al. If an injunction is sought for removal of my priveleges during an ArbCom case while issues are investigated, I will voluntarily give up my status, given that unless ArbCom decides or any of the above conditions are met I will have my priveleges returned, to the extent it is feasible.[3]

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ "Good standing" is, for my purposes, any user who has no current blocks, no sanctions from ArbCom, and has no clear COI (i.e., disgruntled user whom I blocked for disruption.) The test for the latter qualification would be "payback" impetus.
  2. ^ There's no hard and fast rule for this; it's purely up to my discretion, but if I see users who I have had significant positive interactions with demonstrate a lack of faith for my character, that's certainly an indicator.
  3. ^ I'd have to check what the options are for resysopping voluntarily after. Assuming there is no cloud around my actions (assuming there wouldn't be, otherwise I would stand for RfA as stated above) I don't think that would be a problem. I'll get back to that.)