Talk:David Rittenhouse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. | ||
 |
This article is part of the WikiProject Numismatics, which is an attempt to facilitate the categorization and creation of accurate and formal Numismatism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join and see a list of open tasks to help with. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Philadelphia, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. | ||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject Pennsylvania. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|||
[edit] Planet
What planet did he discover? Can we have a link to this planet instead of planets in general?
He didn't discover a planet. I think I have tracked down the original source of that strange claim to a University of Pennsylvania archives page. I contacted them and they have also removed it from their website. --Flying fish 16:25, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rittenhouse is unlikely to have worked with either William Penn or Lord Baltimore, both of whom died before he was born. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.166.34.254 (talk) 20:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Repetitive and badly constructed
While the information in this page is very informative, the way it is presented is repetitive and the whole article is badly constructed.
I do not have time right now to clean it up, but will TRY to come back to it in the next few days or weeks. If anybody would care to start cleaning it up in the meantime, it would be appreciated.
CielProfond (talk) 02:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
