Talk:David Levy (chess player)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Title?

As Levy is less well known as a chess player than as an AI researcher / pundit, I'd suggest a change of title. David Levy (AI researcher)? 80.2.210.118 (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Is that really true? He authored a number of chess books in the 1970s. At least early on, his main AI notabiliy was with respect to chess (chess computers and his famous bet). So I think "David Levy (chess player)" is appropriate. Peter Ballard (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't see anything wrong with naming him as a Chess Player, after all his work in AI seems to have derived from that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZincBelief (talkcontribs) 13:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] sentences/paragraphs

The article has too many one sentence paragraphs.

It needs to be rewritten. Bubba73 (talk), 07:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)