Talk:Daunte Culpepper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	College football Portal Daunte Culpepper is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment Comments This article has been rated for quality but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daunte Culpepper article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

	American football Portal This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary on the comment page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is part of WikiProject Minnesota Vikings, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Minnesota Vikings and the National Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Contents 1 Knee injury 2 Fumbles 3 Too many sections 4 WikiProject class rating

[edit] Knee injury

I remember reading an article on NFL.com where a surgeon specialist was qouted as saying something regarding a long term/permanent impact on the knee, which would make back-peddling very painfull as well as drawing speculation as to wether or not culpepper will ever be able to play again - ever. problem is i can't find the article now to reference it, any help? Mithotyn 11:24, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Although I can't help you with referencing, I will say this: should Culpepper continue to play, he'll never be the same. That injury has rendered him all but immobile, and I doubt he will ever see the same kind of success he had earlier in his career again. 66.80.212.78 20:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fumbles

Dante has the highest fumble percentage in the history of the NFL for QB's. Thank goodness we can move on to the future with hopefully a young QB, but McCombs jobbed us. The Vikings are nothing with out Randy Moss. -TheNew Medici

[edit] Too many sections

This article has way too many sections. Every season or phase of his life doesn't need its own two sentence section. Trevor GH5 18:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)