User talk:Darrenss

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] User page tidy up

I have taken the liberty of doing a tidy up to your user page. What I did was change external links to wikipages into wiki links, highlighted section titles.

I also removed to links to yahoo groups as they cant be considered a source for article material and are causing distress to other editors. The result of this is consuming a lot of unnecessary time with other editors addressing the the problems. Gnangarra 14:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Also your user page is on semi-protection meaning you, most users and all admins can edit it. Your talk page is still editable by anybody, though. I was initially waiting for another incident before doing it, but I looked at the history and saw it's been ongoing for months. I now have the page on watchlist so we'll know if it recurs. Agreed with Gnangarra's comments above. Orderinchaos 11:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Alan Jones (radio broadcaster)

I hope that you have seen the responses to your comments at the above. I am sure that you can make a useful contribution to this article given the complexity of the person and the ranges of responses to him. My response is probably more negative than yours but I am sure that all the editors who contribute to this article can reach a consenus on what should be included and excluded. In any event your countribution would I hope be respected and valued. Albatross2147 02:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Albatross, thanks for the invite. It is much more important for me to get along well with everyone, having said that I wouldn't be trying to remove anything from the article at all just add. I'm going to be flat out very soon studying so I will reserve contributions for later anyway. Take care.Darrenss 03:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Potter's House Christian Fellowship. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. I can understand that you are trying to improve the article, but just be careful to stay on the right side of WP:NPOV. Thewinchester (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Winchester, I tried talking to User:Sapienz but he deleted my post from his talk page. I discussed the issues on the Wayman Mitchell and the Potter's House Christian Fellowship talk page without any response. I can't work with him if he doesn't explain his problem to me. This is the same behavior that Nick Sayers adopted. Thanks for letting me know anyway.Darrenss 22:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The unnamed user

I know who is is. He was banned under user:potters house, than he vandelised my home page more than 20 times in june as an IP address and now he has a registered username User:Sapienz. He is a major pain in the neck and has been dificult to deal with. Plz let me know if this IP guy gives you any more trouble, so we can take the appropriate action. All the best on your edits.Darrenss 08:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I wish I knew which anon. user you're talking about, but I don't. Which one are you talking about? Gscshoyru 09:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that, while clearing out prods, I investigated Sapienz and have come to suspect him of being a sockpuppet of Potters house. So I've opened a case (ha ha) at WP:SSP if you're interested in commenting. It seems there's a long history here. Daniel Case 05:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop posting on my user page or I will report you. Sapienz 12:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Than don't come and cause PROBLEM EDITS if you won't take part in the discussion and follow WIKI POLICY. I gave you a friendly invitation to allow the good editors to explain your links are SPAM so you won't continue your erratic bahavior by sneaking around causing all soughts of problems because you can't get along with any other editors and you think everyone is out to GET YOU. <G> Darrenss 20:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

FYI: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFTY09c0hZ8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.5.72 (talk) 13:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks I'll leave this here for evdience...Darrenss 07:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8uR1xnvHMk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.5.72 (talk) 11:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

What have these clips got to do with wikipedia away??Darrenss 12:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

Darren, in future, don't endlessly revert vandalism, it honestly gets you nowhere and doesn't paint you in the best light. If the other side isn't listening, explain your position on his talk page and then if you need to, ask an admin to intervene or post a message at WP:AIV. User:121.218.65.141 has had at least 15 edits reverted but no message on his talk page - this makes it hard for a reviewing admin to decipher the dispute. Anyway, he's now warned. If you need any help in the future let me know. —Moondyne 08:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)