User talk:Darrelljon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
 Start a new talk topic.

Welcome!

Hello, Darrelljon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 22:03, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Importance tag

Hello! I have noticed you are tagging singles from Ayumi Hamasaki with the Template:music-importance tag. Although I appreciate your interest in editing Wikipedia, please refrain using such tag with her singles, as she is a well known artist in Japan and her singles are usually best-sellings. Thanks! -- ReyBrujo 20:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

What if they don't all meet the Wikipedia guidelines for songs notability and would be better merged into the article for the album on which they appear?--Darrelljon 10:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for not having replied before, please reply in my Talk page whenever I post here, otherwise I may never reply to your inquiries :) If you believe a single does not fit the criteria, afd it. Don't do a massive AFD, though, either use the method for multiple AFD, or post one, see what the community thinks about that, and then act based on the judgement that has been raised. Or you can discuss in a talk page about why you think the song should not be included in Wikipedia. -- ReyBrujo 19:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dragon Warrior

Ditto. youngamerican (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Ayu singles

Hello! There are currently no notability frame for singles. There have been discussions for a year or so here, you can go, find the correct thread, and add your opinion there. My personal opinion is similar to the inclusionists of M:Inclusionism: if it is not against the policies, it is fine. A single that sells over 100,000 copies and/or hits the #1 at the Oricon chart can be considered successful. You can also go to a single and post in the talk page the reasons you believe the article does not fit the criteria. It is discussed, and if no agreement is reached, you can send it to AFD to see if the community agrees with you. Hope that helps! And remember, if you want to reply, go to my Talk page, find the Ayu singles section, and post the reply there :-) -- ReyBrujo 19:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PAGI ??

Can you provide cites, showing notability of PAGI and their black poppy activity, to support the text you inserted into Remembrance Day and White Poppy? Thanks! The way the articles stand now that sentence just kind of hangs there... ++Lar: t/c 14:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wirral Grammar School for Boys

Hi, sorry for the delay, but I've replied to your comment about the incidents on the talk page. Just wondering what your comments were Guycalledryan 00:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Backfu1986VHS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Backfu1986VHS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Backfu2002R1DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Backfu2002R1DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Backfu2002R2DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Backfu2002R2DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Backfu2005R1DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Backfu2005R1DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BackfuCED.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BackfuCED.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] History of open source

The "History of open source" article was a copyright violation of this: [1]

If the author of that paper really wants to host it on a wiki, it should be posted on Wikisource. --Gronky (talk) 11:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Backfu1993LaserDisc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Backfu1993LaserDisc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] stubs for 2 actresses

Hi, Darrelljon
Wonder can you pls add 2 stubs for KateModern leading actresses : Alexandra Weaver & Tara Rushton. I have already made 2 stubs of mine here,

  1. Alexandra Weaver
  2. Tara Rushton

but I am not confident enough to write articles in English. Thx !! Carla Bruni —Preceding comment was added at 00:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)