| Archives |
- 2006
- 2007
- January, 2007
- February, 2007
- March, 2007
- April, 2007
- May, 2007
- June, 2007
- July, 2007
- August, 2007
- September, 2007
- October, 2007
- November, 2007
- December, 2007
- 2008
|
Nicholas White
Under no circumstances remove this article through speedy deletion. If you HONESTLY believe that it is not worthy of Wikipedia, take it to AFD. Necroidmancer 03:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
User:Necroidmancer
I never said that's what I'm going to do, keep cool! --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 22:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- First of all, the answer is "I don't know." Second of all, why are we dicussing that? Also, your "new message" is way to obvious with the footnote. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 22:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- BTW, since when were you with CVU? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 08:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, the note gives it away to.
Actually, I didn't believe it was real. So there's no reason for you to be laughing. --HideandLeek 08:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Anyway, thanks for the warning about my articles being at risk of deletion. =)
--HideandLeek 08:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 16:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kzrulzuall! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
On this closed AfD, you wrote:
- There's a product info on the Microsoft Windows Mobile page, which should be considered an independent source, as the company isn't related to microsoft. There is also reviews there.[1]--[|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 08:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Just thought I'd let you know that the page you linked to is just a copy of the JSJ press release. I don't think it can be counted as an independent source, because they apparently release anything sent to them that seems appropriate. JulesH 23:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
User page
Nice, new user page! I once thought of doing that type of user page from seeing AndonicO's but I though I'll do it when I have my experimenting time. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think it needs a LOT more fixing now...--The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 01:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- 2 things:
- Black doesn't look good with purple
- The pictures don't link to your pages --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 01:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Why does it have to be red? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 01:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- First things first- the images don't even match the links. Featured articles have nothing to do with vandalism nor does edit counts have to do with the Crab Nebula. Secondly, try using the Click template for your pictures. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- They don't look good, two of the pictures have a white border on a black background. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, why did you change my status? I'm about to go soon so I couldn't be bothered to change it! --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- My Talk and Vandalism Log...you don't know how to use Click do you? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- ...which I in turn copied from Why1991 who in turn copied it from who knows! Recognise this?
--The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Now for my user page
Does this look O.K.? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's slightly different to my current user page (which is soon to be a "portal" style like yours or AndonicO's) but does it have any errors like the other time? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I mean. Remember how you emailed me a picture of what you saw which didn't match the one I saw nor the library's view? Well, at least I can use "float" properly now... --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Done! What do you think of it? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- There's only two differences from before- the end part is split into two columns and the "real life" is actually moved from the left to the right and the edit counter is moved slightly to the left. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Better? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Now?? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, I got rid of the "new message" joke --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Tags
Please also consider placing a warning tag on the authors talk-page. That will help trace repeat offenders. Thanks. Agathoclea 23:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the message. I am still trying to figure out how to edit here, but what I have corrected were spelling, and content clarification, on information not factual "only". Thank you very much. Re: User talk:70.95.136.95 from [|.Z.K|] 00:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC
I'd blocked this account, then noticed your doppelganger notice. I assume you'd like the account to remain blocked? -- Longhair\talk 05:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Doppelgangers
How about Kzrulzall? I sometimes type that. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Mystery user
I think so too. I saw the vandalism (in plural) but you reverted it before me. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem
No problem. Thank you for your advice about making an account. That is a good idea. Re:User talk:70.95.136.95[|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 01:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Your user page...
...was under attack from a bunch of new users, who seem to know you in real life.[2] As such, I've semi-protected your userpage for 5 days. If you wish for me to remove this for any reason, please just ask. I did the same with User:Kzrulzuall/UserPage, for the same reasons.[3] Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 09:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I have indefblocked the User:Checkuser Admin account, because its name suggests that its creator is (a) a Wikipedia admin, and (b) has checkuser privileges, as per Wikipedia's username policy. -- The Anome 09:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Ngchikit 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Grand LisboaNgchikit 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC) The opening of above casino is reported by CNN. [4] Is that notable enough for you now? Ngchikit 13th Feb 2007. 13:24 Hong Kong Time.
Page vandalism
Hi This User:Trampton(owner of the page that you say I vandalized),What do you mean that what I wrote is nonsense,that science is not god? or what?That is my page and have the freedom to write what I want, is this not a free website?, that you can write what want?What do you believe in?What Saikano wrote that science is god?Please do not take it the wrong way,please reply. 71.96.243.187 09:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
First of all, your user page is very cool, second is: is it possible for me to clean my discussion page and start over again? (Trampton 05:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)). \
Coffee Page
Hi you removed the edit I did for the coffee page, and I was very curious as to why this happened. Especially since the LDS section seems slightly irrelevant. (religious section) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.17.230 (talk)
Aladdin (List of movies sorted by uses of word fuck)
You reverted my edit on what was pretty obviously vandalized before I fixed it. Even if for some reason you thought that the movie with the most fucks in it was Aladdin, you might note that every other link in the same row points to the movie in question.
Mystified! 24.69.167.145 03:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hey, thanks for the help on Nike, strange how someone is imitating your username. --Xertz 00:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Gr...
Why do you have to copy almost every (good) thing I do? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey <name removed> :D ~Welcome to the Black Parade~ 09:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
NPWatcher
I added you to the list. Cheers! —— Eagle101 Need help? 17:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Someone Is Messing With My IP
I keep getting messages that I've edited some page about some weird tool (crocodile shears?) and I haven't done anything nor have I even heard of this thing. I just want to know how to get rid of the message and why I'm being charged with vandalism on trying to delete messages on my own IP (UserTalk:65.255.130.104). I don't who is doing this with my IP or why, but it's getting old. -A Concerned User
P.S. I posted this on my page.
whts your problem man? ur fucking me up just beacuse im saying something that u dont know, do i have to make a photo from my cd? 1971!!!!!!!
oh i see, Ok, i understand! :D i was just trying to make it more human! :D
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Simpsons WikiProject
Greetings, The Simpsons WikiProect is currently trying to decide on five episode articles to classify as being high importance and as a member of the WikiProject, your input would be appreciated. You can vote here. Thanks for the time, Scorpion 07:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Dutrochet.jpg
Any image of him published while he was alive would be public domain today. —Chowbok ☠ 16:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The above archive is a past discussion. Please direct all new discussion to the current talk page. Thank you.
