User talk:Darienfawkes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on The Gungner Theories, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not so much the copyright issue (though see WP:COPYRIGHT), as that there was no indication that this unpublished book was notable (see Wikipedia:Notability), as recognized by reliable independent sources (see Wikipedia:Verifiability. We get dozens of people a day trying to post articles on the books they're working on and hope to publish someday. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 17:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Notability for inclusion of books is laid out in Wikipedia:Notability (books). The criteria are such that even a published book is not notable enough to automatically qualify. Therefore your book, which is both uncompleted and unpublished is highly unlikely to qualify.
- Furthermore, writing about yourself or things you are officially connected to is strongly discouraged on wikipedia by Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, as it goes against the aim of wikipedia to produce a neutral verifiable encyclopedia. Connected to that, using wikipedia to promote your book violates Wikipedia:Spam. I strongly recommend you read those pages, especially the How not to be a spammer section of the latter.
- While wikipedia may not be the place for your book, I do encourage you strongly to stay and contribute. the knowledge you've gained researching and writing your book may help improve articles related to its subject matter. Or you may find other articles you can positively contribute to. Improbcat (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
