User talk:Daredevil555

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you! :D
Some cookies to welcome you! :D

Welcome to Wikipedia, Harsh1125! I am Sniperz11 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Sniperz11@CS 21:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re Comparable aircrafts J10 / F-16 B50/52

Ok. I will look through it again. Thanks for informing me. Regards ChowHui (talk) 05:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JF-17 Thunder

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on JF-17 Thunder. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Rlandmann (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Sure, but as the notice above states, edit warring may still lead to administrative action even if the reverts don't take place within a 24-hour period. If you want to change specifications around, you might want to discuss it on the article's talk page, and provide references to reliable sources. Simply hitting "undo" isn't really a very helpful way to handle content disputes. --Rlandmann (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
No problem. Since it was never made clear (as far as I could see), what is the source of the data you provided? --Rlandmann (talk) 06:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, but I've reverted to the previous version, since the specifications you provided don't appear to come from a reliable source, as Wikipedia defines the term. The previous set of specifications were from Aviation Week & Space Technology. --Rlandmann (talk) 07:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Note that defencetalk.com also does not meet Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source and under no circumstances should be used to replace material that is from a reliable source. This has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that defencetalk appears to be broken at the moment - it's simply that we don't know the credentials of those publishing information through that website. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summaries

Please add an edit summary with your edits. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)