Talk:Darwinia (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
It's too bad some people might argue against the phrase 'This novel sucked' as being an objective fact. However, the discussion page on this is safe to make such observations in.
If you've looked at this book on the shelf and thought it looked cool, like I did, don't waste your money. Dodger 03:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Darwinia(1stEd).jpg
Image:Darwinia(1stEd).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] copyright violation?
So, as of the revision at 03:18 on 30 June 2005, User:Quantum bird added text which appears to be a copy of the Amazon.com editorial review by Craig Engler. This has since been expanded upon and changed, but the underlying text still reflects its origins. I doubt anyone's watching this discussion page, so I'm going to add a copyright tag to the main page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.83.114 (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
