User talk:Danielgrad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Petrovici.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petrovici.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A question

{{helpme}}

On the Ion Petrovici talk page there was a {{WPBiography}} template added that rated the article as Stub-Class. Meanwhile, I have rewritten the article by translating the Romanian version and I don't know if the rating still applies to the new article... I couldn't find anything about this, except to re-rate it myself, but I'm very new to Wikipedia and I'm not ready to start rating articles on my own account, especially articles that I have written or translated myself. –Danielgrad 13:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography is a group of users who will, among other things, rate biographical articles; asking for the article to be re-rated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment would seem to be the best course of action here. --ais523 13:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the answer... I'll try that –Danielgrad 13:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

{{helpme}} I found a page that seems to have been vandalized numerous times and I just can't separate good content from nonsense. Is there a tag for these kind of pages to alert editors to check the page and take appropriate action? I need someone who can correctly judge the content of that article. –Danielgrad 14:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Tag it as {{NPOV}} ..----Cometstyles 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Why NPOV? I'm not disputing neutrality... It's just full or random nonsense and minor edits that probably made the article inaccurate. The article is Premier League 2007-08. There are different IP's all adding small edits every few minutes. –Danielgrad 15:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eddie Grant - Reparation 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eddie Grant - Reparation 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Updated fair use. --- Danielgrad 10:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:God Is Greater than Man.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:God Is Greater than Man.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Updated fair use. --- Danielgrad 10:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ro:Racoviţa, Sibiu

Ce a-ti zice sa ajutati la traducerea unui articol de calitate reprezentativ pentru satul romanesc? Asybaris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.76.201.176 (talk) 09:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

ok, o sa incerc — Danielgrad (talk) 10:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)