User talk:DanielTAR
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sockpuppet
DYK: Sock puppeteer could be ban from editing Wikipedia. I think you should make sure you use your user name to edit rather than IP address. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry for more information. --Aleenf1 06:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your TAR
Your version of TAR seemse really cool: I would really like to help you with it! Shapiros10 (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Changes in TAR
But it uses different methods under the color rules. It says to leave it alone unless it uses a different method. Furthermore you are violating the confusion rules and changing it to just blue is vandlizing the confusion rules. Oscar22 20:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Well if I can't change color, then could you at least use underlined for the money penalty, the [] for the time penalty and the slanted for the speed bump non elimnation penalty? Oscar22 20:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] MfD nomination of User:DanielTAR/DanielTAR2
User:DanielTAR/DanielTAR2, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DanielTAR/DanielTAR2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DanielTAR/DanielTAR2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BonesBrigade 04:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- What does TAR mean, what is TAR, and what does your username mean? โBoL 04:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's obvious if you look at his contributions this is regarding "The Amazing Race". --12 Noon 2ยข 04:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know that he has a COI, but I'm trying to get him to crack. โBoL 05:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's obvious if you look at his contributions this is regarding "The Amazing Race". --12 Noon 2ยข 04:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Talk page
Sorry, you are violating the article talk page policy, that is no your point of view, no forum and not bring any unverified contents up to Wikipedia. We are deal with facts here, and please stay with objectives to provide the true. --Aleenf1 06:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, i don't get it, this is what your point of view about me. So, all the talk page can be found here. "The policies that apply to articles also apply (if not to the same extent) to talk pages, including Wikipedia's verification, neutral point of view and no original research policies." So, what you wrote in talk page:
- Your point of view about the Race progress, violate Stay objective section
- Deal with facts, you bring up something that not release by any press, so i have told before forum is not a reliable source, so don't bring that up to Wikipedia. Exactly, you can discuss whether this is reliable sources, should it add to Wikipedia, but not bring it up just keep people intesrested.
So, talk page, is use to how to improve article, discussion, make proposals, make people understand what you did, not presenting your point point of view and bring something just to keep people interested.
Another, don't judging people like that, i hope you can. I know my English is worse, many have said that, but i working so much harder for long time in Wiki, and more important, how to make people trust me, thats all. And i edit anything base on policy, so i bring YOUR PAGE up for discussion, so that is not to insult people, but is work via policy, and many people will judging this, not just me. I hope you can read all the policy before posting any talk, don't judging people that despite someone are object you, than you react by saying people dislike your editing, that must be some reason behind this. So anything i can discuss with you, but i hope you don't bring up something that violate the policy. --Aleenf1 17:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, policy that apply to article will apply to talk page too, i hope you can understand this. Anyway, i hope no conflict between us, i am always welcome anything that true and right. Of course, i working for so many times (4 i think), you are the only one who bring up this to Wikipedia, no one do so far, i probably can think because the policy. So, it is not deny that when season in-progress, people will use forum as sources, but that is always verifiability issues that Wikipedia always concerns. I always welcome you. :) --Aleenf1 09:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] TAR 14
If you review CBS' official press release it only describes the network's fall lineup. The TVWeek article was written before CBS' official press release and its information has already been refuted by the network's official statement. Unless you can find another source, you're speculating that TAR14 will air in the fall (with TAR13) or in the winter, when CBS hasn't even released its winter schedule yet... that's not permitted per WP:OR --Madchester (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)