User talk:DanielDemaret/Archives/Archive 12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I voted.DanielDemaret 07:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Wikiethics
Hi Daniel, the discussion on the Wikipedia:Wikiethics page is continuing at the personal confict level. If you believe the important of the proposal I would appreciate for your contributions and appearance on the discussion page. Please note that this proposal cannot be completed or become successful without your contributions. Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 03:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I put in my POV into the discussion.DanielDemaret 07:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposal
Hi Daniel, I hope you are doing fine... We are about to finalize the revision of Wikiethics proposal. I was wondering if you have some time to review the last form of it. Any comments are appreciated. Best, Resid Gulerdem 01:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stanley Greenspan and The First Idea
The First Idea must be a really interesting book. I wasn't aware there were more stages. Could you elaborate on this please? And how are you interested/do you know the work of Stanley Greenspan? --Bronwyn Gannan 07:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Hallå
Du undrade tidgare om "intent". list sen att svara nu, men bättre nu än aldrig. Jag skulle vilja säga att man blir förolämpad när man någon hävdar att man besiter en egenskap som man bestrider att man har. Sen kan hävdandet vara medveted eller omedveted. --Striver 09:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
