User talk:Dancter/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1
| Archive 2 →


Contents

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Dancter/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 03:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Wii references

Nice job fixing up the Wii references!! jaco♫plane 00:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Wii Remote

Sorry for messing up the meters -> feet part (I thought it seemed a bit short...), but I decided to scrap everything there, as most of it was lifted from the references. Ladlergo 03:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

No worries. You probably had lumped my stuff in with the stuff that was added about the batteries, which was ripped straight off the web page. It's an understandable mistake; I tend to be fairly deliberate in my wording, so I can see how it would be mistaken for plagiarism.
Actually, after you "corrected" me, I measured, just to make sure. I had assumed that because it needed a sensor bar, that the range of the Remotes would be fairly short. But it's actually better than I anticipated. The Wavebird's rated range was 6 meters, and I found that to be more than enough. Dancter 03:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Apologies Accepted

Sorry about my confusion...apologies accepted. rcandelori 14:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

The playstation 3 page is being constantly vandalised so I am exluded under the rule according to the article. rcandelori 15:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, at least as concerns 72.153.114.85, some of that editor's more recent edits seem to indicate that their intent was not to vandalize. Anyway, it seems the issue has cooled since someone warned them on their talk page. It's all good. Anyway, happy editing! Dancter 15:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

My workspace page

Thanks for catching that - I forgot the "User:" part when I created the page. I've filed a note here to get the main space redirect deleted. --Ckatz 05:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I thought it was probably best not to delete it right away, just in case you expected to find it there. Dancter 05:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

WiiConnect24

Sorry about my citation fussiness on WiiConnect24; I did not notice the words "There has been skepticism". Thanks for changing the last statement back to "citation needed", it isn't really "original research". -- Daverocks (talk) 07:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Muslim Cloth

Nice job on correcting the errers [sic] of spelling-challenged campus cops! I was waiting to see if anybody caught the muslim/muslin thing, but I didn't imagine that anyone would do such an elegant fix. My hat is off to your technical editing ability. Lou Sander 22:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Upper case - wording

You're right - looking back, I was wrong to switch Ethernet->ethernet and so on. Lesson learned. Thanks for correcting the article. --Oscarthecat 20:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Reverting

Perhaps you misunderstand me. I did NOT revert the article in ANY way. I merely went into the previous ones code, searched for the sections of the sensor bar, went into the CURRENT articles section, and put it back where it was in the first place. I did NOT revert the article in any way, I did NOT use the automatic method and I did NOT use the method you mentions (of copying the ENTIRE code and replacing the two). This is getting increasingly frustrating with people like you accusing me of doing something that the history clearly shows I did not do. Get your facts stright before making accusations.--ItIsMe 09:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps you fail to understand what I did. I simply PASTED the article back in. NOTHING more. So it is impossible for me to have messed it up as I didn't change a single thing other then adding the article BACK in. And if you'd bothered to check this 'Novermber' thing was in the previous edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wii&diff=prev&oldid=61793061) that someone ELSE had done. Again I must ask you to get your facts straight before accusing others of such things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ItIsMe (talk • contribs) 10:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
The Novermber thing is in the previous edit, but to the point, I believe what happened was an error on wikipedia's end. I think what occured is I went into the edit page sections. While I was editting it someone else went on and changed some things. Then when I'd put the article back in I saved the changes, which would have saved what was BEFORE I editted it and AFTER I editted it. Unfortunetely it seems that whatever edits were done while I was putting the topic back in were deleted. It seems that this has caused much confusion that you think I changed things but all I did was add the topic back in. Anything else would be a problem with the system wikipedia works by. --ItIsMe 11:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Shawn Spencer Infobox

Thanks for changing that to the template...I couldn't find a template, so I cribbed a fake infobox from the veronica mars characters. This is much better.Transcendentalstate 12:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

HappyVR and PS3

Just thought you would like to know that HappyVR is under a week block right now. This most likely is the reason he hasn't put any responses down in support of the PS3 tally. I've put a comment on the page suggesting a delay on vote judgement until his block is lifted. Ex-Nintendo Employee 21:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the infobox fix, again

I was in the middle of editing that infobox when I suddenly got called away. 5 minutes later, I came back to fix it, and bang, you had been there, like a knight in shining armor. How did you know I had worked on it?Transcendentalstate 19:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi, Dancter/Archive 1, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page, install it, and you're all set!

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:UBX/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team!. - Glen 18:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

LiveJournal

I have no problems with anyone correcting my work but please let me know if you do so, so that I can improve the quality of my contributions. I have no idea if I make a mistake if someone doesn't take the time to tell me.

I don't think I'm asking for a lot. Thanks. — Nathan (talk) / 18:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Game Boy Sales

Hi, Dancter. Thank you so much for adding the Game Boy sales data links- I've been trying to find a good source for that information for the longest time. You've saved me a big headache! :D Ex-Nintendo Employee 06:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Super Mario Strikers

I will consider leaving it the way you have it now, but the original name was Super Mario Strikers and was just re-named for Europe. The way it currently is written makes it sound like the name was originally "Mario Smash Football" and re-named for North American and Japan. TJ Spyke 21:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps there's a way to word it better to emphasize that "Super Mario Strikers" is the original naming, but "Mario Smash Football" was how they presented it in Leipzig, so we can't say they announced it otherwise. If you have any ideas, feel free to give it a shot. Dancter 21:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Battalion Wars 2

Thanks for helping with the image, I never had that problem putting images in wrestling infoboxes. TJ Spyke 22:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for uploading the logo. I don't remember if having the manual image markup is necessary with most other infoboxes, but it seems it is for the CVG one. Dancter 22:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Marrio Kart Wii

On the Mario Kart Wii Article you put a AfD tag that links to the Paper Mario Wii AfD. When I went to the real Mario Kart AfD I found and archive from this year with a vote for delete. Should it just be redeleted as it seems people keep making it again? I also suggest removing it from the Mario Kart Template.Sir hugo 20:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't attempt a {{db-repost}} on Mario Kart Wii because I wasn't familiar with the content in the previous version of Mario Kart Wii, and particularly didn't know whether the Hideki Konno statements were used in that version. I figured the conservative route was the way to go. But delisting it from the template doesn't seem that controversial. I'll go ahead and do that now. Dancter 20:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm armed with my POV and I'm not afraid to use it!

[[image:Middle_finger.JPG|frame|Stop reverting me, for f*** sake]] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.106.188.236 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

External Link - Microsoft Zune

According to your policy on External Links, what value are Zunearmy and Zuneuser adding to the Microsoft Zune page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zdogmktg (talk • contribs) 14:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The issue of external links is being debated in the Microsoft Zune talk page. Please bring it up there. Dancter 14:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

External Link - The Noble Leader

Why is the external link that I added to The Noble Leader considered spam? It is not commercial, and the author is a subject matter expert. I am adding the link rather than he. And according to the guidelines established on WP:External_links, I am in compliance. See items 3, 4, and 5 under "What should be linked to". What's the problem? You don't have the right to remove my editing privileges or blacklist the site when I'm complying with the guidelines.

-Stormpeak —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stormpeak (talk • contribs) 21:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

This is the first time you have responded to messages concerning the addition of your link. Concerning your arguments for including the link according to Wikipedia:External links#What should be linked to: it does not qualify under item 3 as a "prominent site", it does not qualify under item 4 as "neutral and accurate material not already in the article", and its qualification under item 5 is debatable as "meaningful, relevant content". It does, however, seem to possibly fall under several categories under "Links normally to be avoided":
1. Site does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes a Wikipedia:Featured article. I would argue that it does not provide a sufficiently unique resource beyond what the article currently has.
2. Site contains mostly opinion or unverified original research, and certainly doesn't qualify as a reputable source.
4. While the site claims to be non-commercial, it is a website for a book that could be sold, and provides excerpts which may serve to promote that book.
9. It is a blog, running on WordPress, and the subject matter does not mandate such a link.
If you still disagree, please discuss the issue further on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dancter 21:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

My barnstars?!

What the hell... how cheap is that, lifting those barnstars right off of my userpage. :/ Nope, I've never encountered that user, and I certainly never authorized him to swipe my barnstars. --Coffee 17:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

semiprotection

thats because you arent new or anonymous, so it wont appear to be protected to youKaratenerd 07:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

It's just that the logs don't seem to indicate the semi-protection state, and that your edit count seems too low for an admin, which you'd need to be in order to actually do the semi-protection. Throwing up the template doesn't actually do anything by itself. On the other hand, removing the template doesn't acually do anything by itself, either, so I don't see that I'd done much harm either way. If I was mistaken, and the article had actually been semi-protected, please let me know where I went wrong. Dancter 07:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Xbox 360

There are several better sources for the 5 mil. figure found in the infobox at the top of the article [1] [2]. As for the sales predictions, your edits were correct, I didn't check that they were in a "by-the-end-of-the-quarter" context, sorry about that. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 18:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

re:edit to The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy

Sorry, but that wasn't vandalism; Grim's accent is actually Romanian, not Jamaican. The Grim Reaper is a Romanian (from the Carpathian Forest) entity, not a jamaican entity. Nice try, though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AtomikWarTerrorizor (talk • contribs) 07:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

I realized that I had made mistakes but had to leave the computer I was on. I came back to fix it but you already had. Thanks. Jasper23 07:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

No big deal. I'm still trying to get the hang of the sockpuppet reporting procedures myself, so it's good practice. Dancter 08:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I Love New York

Excuse you but number one you DON'T talk to ME like that. And number two, what makes that so complicated? How did I Interfere. Everything is back to normal biatch. The H-B-I-C 05:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks :) – ClockworkSoul 14:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Super Swing Golf

I edited the Super Swing Golf article, leaving the name PangYa for the original PC game only. However, I do not know how to edit the page title. Duhman0009 19:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

You can rename the page using the move command. Dancter 20:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Learn something new everyday, thank you Duhman0009 20:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Microsoft Zune Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft Zune Logo.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


?

are you an elctrnc engineer of sorts? 172.201.68.128 20:09, 14 November 2006 Chavatshimshon 20:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand the context of this question. Is this concerning contributions of mine? Dancter 20:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

About Princess Daisy Beening in Brawl

How do you know about Princess Daisy beening in Brawl Why? 70.110.165.160 at Verison 21

I don't. But as I mentioned in my message, "Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable." Statements that had been added on Princess Daisy being in Super Smash Bros. Brawl did not seem to meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you feel the statements should be in the article, you should cite sources for them to show that they are verifiable. Dancter 23:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Leave that cite sources their is for a reason for Princess Daisy beening in Super Smash Bros Brawl. 70.110.165.160 At Verison 23 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.110.165.160 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

{{citation needed}} tags are for things that are not doubtful. Whether Princess Daisy is in Super Smash Bros. Brawl is certainly doubtful. That I didn't just remove it as doubtful and harmful was a courtesy, to allow some discussion on the matter. Dancter 23:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Please leave that page on there is for Princess Daisy will be on Brawl. Masahiro Sakurai will make Princess Daisy a playable character.70.110.165.160 at Verison 0. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.110.165.160 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

As I've tried to convey several times already, you need to verify your information. Otherwise there is no way for editors such as me to tell that you didn't just make it up. I repeat, "Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable." Dancter 00:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Super Mario Football

Ok, whatever. Don't believe about Super Mario Football but when it comes out, tell me. Super Mario 005 06:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Princess Daisy Voice is Jen Taylor 2002-persent

Ok Princess Daisy is voice by Jen Taylor now and Princess Daisy is going to be on Brawl. And her voice is going to be Jen Taylor in the uncoming Super Smash Bros Brawl 70.110.165.160 at verison 3 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.110.165.160 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Um, no. Daisy is voiced by Deanna Mustard. She has not been confirmed for Brawl, either. Also, I believe that Jen Taylor does not voice Nintendo characters anymore, seeing as Nicole Mills and Kelsey Hutchingson have voiced Peach and Toad recently (though, Taylor has voiced Peach this year once or twice). 124.177.205.43 03:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm serious; the only way resolve this is to provide evidence. Continuing to insist on its veracity to other editors won't get around this. Dancter 04:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Sd31415/Thumb

Congratulations!

Congratulations, Dancter! You are Nintendo Wii's second biggest editor! Keep up the great work! • s d 3 1 4 1 5 talk.

You are the biggest contributor to the PlayStation 3 article! s d 3 1 4 1 5 talk • contribs 02:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I just created a new Princess Daisy page

  • User Dancter please go see the new Princess Daisy e page. It has the same stuff in it. 151.197.228.21 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.197.228.21 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Edit to Nintendo DS - marketing and sales

Your edit has been reverted, anyone who does not know the difference between america and the US is also not likely to be a person who uses Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.163.194 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I would not make many presumptions about who uses the English Wikipedia other than that they probably have some grasp of written English. Nevertheless, there are other reasons why I made the changes, not the least of which are that the existing source does not verify those particular figures. If you're insistent on that previous revision, it can be discussed on the talk page. Dancter 20:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

About not being sockpuppet of Michelle3801

  • I don't want to be a sockpuppet that's enough of that ok Dancter. User DaisyDenfender582 at verison 21. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DaisyDefender582 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Dancter

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article A Bathing Ape, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

edit to Mario Superstar Baseball

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. 70.16.149.9 at verison 19. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.16.149.9 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm assuming you're referring to this edit, based on your reversion. I doubt anyone who examines the evidence would support your characterization of my edits as blatant vandalism. Dancter 19:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Saying good bye to User Dancter and he is not a wikipedia anymore.

Page blanked 02:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC) by 70.16.149.9 and replaced with:

  • Saying good bye to User Dancter and he is going to work in the Food Shop with all kinds of food.
  • Saying good bye to User Dancter and I am going to make corrects from 70.6.149.9.
  • Saying good bye to User Dancter and he is not going to be Wikipedia anymore.
  • Saying good bye to User Dancter because you reverted my edits.
  • Saying good bye to User Dancter and he is going to watch TV.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.16.149.9 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[3]

I sorry for this edit

  • I just saying good bye but I make a bobo for this edit and I'm sorry to you Thanks Dancter.

70.16.149.9 at verison 21.

Image:Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection logo.svg has no source or license and may be illegal

Thanks for uploading Image:Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection logo.svg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

In the history, you can see that I provided both source and licensing information when I first uploaded the file. The page was just blanked by an IP. This all could've been addressed with a simple revert. I'd recommend that you slow down a bit, and exercise a little more discretion with your edits, especially when dealing with other users. You would've kept me from getting unnecessarily annoyed, as well as saved yourself time and effort. While you may think you are being efficient, mistakes like this are no small thing, as many a good contributor has up and left from such carelessness by well-intentioned editors. Dancter 02:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. I think I caught that right as the pizza was ready. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Leave the characters their like Princess Daisy and Sonic in the smash series

Please keep the Princess Daisy and Sonic in the super smash bros series and also Daisy and sonic will be in Super Smash Bros Brawl.

= no proof 70.20.247.66 16:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC) at verison 16.

Please go on Wikitionary and edits some good stuff on the pages thank you 70.20.247.66 18:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)