User talk:Dancefloor royalty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] STICKY & SWEET TOUR

You are warning me about "false edits" in Sticky & Sweet Tour for including Budva and Mexico shows, and they have been CONFIRMED by local promoters:

http://comercial.ocesa.com.mx/conexion/conexion61/conexion61.html

http://www.otvoreni.hr/default.aspx?id=13#59261

UPDATE: Read the press release at madonna.com, it says she'll tour South America!

Crackers2007 (talk) 07:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KYLIEX2008

Why did you put a warning for NPOV on my talk page? For one, I didn't make a non-neutral edit, so the warning was wrong. I reverted vandalism and performed a minor clean up on the page (including resizing the too large photo, overlinking issues, title formatting, etc which I provided in my edit summary). For that, I got snide remark by an anonymous IP to which I reverted back the version that I made because those issues were undone. While doing that, I noticed that there was a song title that seemed wrong (Ruffle My Feathers or something) so I changed that back to Everlasting which was on what I assumed was the last correct set list. If I got the song title wrong, I apologize. Looking at the page now, it seems someone went ahead and undid those changes again for which there's no excuse. As for the warning, that was way off base and you should assume good faith when dealing with an established editor. If you would have asked me first, I would have told you exactly why I made the edits I made in case you missed my edit summaries. For the record, I'm going to do yet another clean up on the page just so you're aware that I'm not "vandalizing" the page or adding NPOV to it. Pinkadelica 21:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the apology. No harm done. On another note, please do not remove comments from article talk pages as you did here. You're free to remove comments and/or warning from your personal talk page, but non-offensive comments on an article talk page should not be removed. Pinkadelica 00:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

It seems everybody believes that now, however, I supported my change into "Ruffle My Feathers" with a direct link to kylie.com news. You can just check out history. Somebody deleted (and reverted, and deleted...) it few times later, however I'm convinced my edit was fully supported by the ref I cited.MiKylie (talk) 09:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kylie Minogue. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KylieFever2002

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of KylieFever2002, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: KylieFever. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kyliefever2002.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyliefever2002.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lg2icover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lg2icover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KylieX2008

This note is regarding your continual removal of the free-use image on the KylieX2008 article and the replacment of it with a fair-use one. I would just suggest that you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Fair Use which states "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." In fact there is a free-use equivalent that is available which I've added now three times to the article providing perfectly the same encyclopedic purpose as the one you keep replacing it with: it is after all Kylie Minogue singing on stage during her KylieX2008 tour. A free-use image means that it can be distributed freely as it has been released into the public domain - this always takes presidents over a fair-use image which probably has a copyright. Perhaps the most laughable thing of all is that the fair-use rationale for your image states "No free or public domain images have been located for this article." when clearly many are available. I myself have made mistakes regarding uploads in the past and I still don't really know much about the topic, but I am sure about what I've just said. This sort of thing is always a lurning curb for everyone. Eagle Owl (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

And to correct you also, I did not upload the image of Kylie Minogue and would never remove another image and replace it with another just because it was my own. The only reason I replaced it was because it was a free-use image and not a screenshot. I'm not getting involved anymore anyway. Eagle Owl (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KylieX2008

You have edited my info on Kylie's Madrid Concert claiming it to be false!!! LOL. Where you there??? Cos I was, actually, and you could see videos in youtube to see that what I wrote was right. She didn't sing Shocked, the setlist order was as I stated and Step back in time was sung during the encore. Rub rb (talk) 09:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)