User talk:Dancarney/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Dancarney/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Boothy443 | comhrá 09:28, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

AFC Sudbury

Hi there - I've had to remove most of the copyrighted material you added to AFC Sudbury from [1]. Wikipedia can't take material copied from other sources unless the copyright owner has given their explicit permission for it to be published under the GFDL license. Feel free to re-add information about the club on AFC Sudbury/Temp, but it has to be entirely in your own words. Cheers, sjorford #£@%&$?! 12:40, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:James Beattie (footballer).jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:James Beattie (footballer).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Derek Mountfield

Great job on this article. Thank you for showing the article a little love. James084 21:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

AFC Sudbury

Hello, I'm working on project about Non-League football stubs, and starting to work on this club, any ideas we can help work together to pull this club off the stub list??

Rakuten06 18:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it looks like it's perfect!! It's only need to find the numbers on the players, which I cannot find it!! If this is successful, who will we ask to check this to see if it can be de-stubed??

Rakuten06 15:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

At this level of football players do not have squad numbers, they are allocated at the beginning of each game. Squad numbers are a relatively new addition to football. Don't know about de-stubbing check.Dancarney 23:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Since AFC Sudbury is de-stubbed, so I already began on the next club: Abingdon United F.C., so I wonder if you will help me on this club to make it de-stubbed?? Thanks for working with me on A.F.C. Sudbury. Reply to me on my page if you have any chances

Rakuten06 22:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


Do you think if the page of Abingdon United F.C. is finished or not??

Rakuten06 01:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I need help on A.F.C. Dunstable, I already finished the players, honours, but can you put the club history on the page for me, please??

Rakuten06 14:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Linking to Defender

When you want to link to the article about the football position defender, please do not link to Defender, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the Defender (football) article, by writing out [[Defender (football)|defender]]. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:SudburyCrest.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ASG.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ASG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:How to know the butterflies of love.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:How to know the butterflies of love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheLovvers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheLovvers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigrTex 23:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

The Lovvers

A tag has been placed on The Lovvers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.129.172.160 23:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mec-trails.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mec-trails.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Slap!.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Slap!.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Roland-Kirk-Blacknuss---Seale-333484.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Roland-Kirk-Blacknuss---Seale-333484.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Space Is The Place.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Space Is The Place.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wedlock_(album).jpg

I have tagged Image:Wedlock_(album).jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 17:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:These_are_the_vistas.jpg

I have tagged Image:These_are_the_vistas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 17:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


Notability of HEALTH

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HEALTH, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HEALTH seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HEALTH, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Xavi

Hello, just dropping by to say thanks for cleaning up the Xavi article. It was quite bad and I tagged it a while ago with lots of POV stuff. Keep up the good work! VincentValentine29 15:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Tamworth

Just wondered who you are, and why you have the god given right to come along and start changing the hard work that me and others have put in on the Tamworth page, there is no reason to remove the pictures on the squad page, so do me and the rest a favour and leave them and the article alone, because you clearly don't know what your doing. Stew jones 12:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

In addition to Stew's above comments, why are you trying to merge History of Tamworth F.C. with Tamworth F.C.? the article for History of Tamworth F.C. was originally started in Tamworth F.C. but was too big for the page. Can you please remove your merge tag, or I will. Jonesy702 14:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid that Wikipedia is open for anyone to edit, so that's the "right" I have to edit a page. I am of the opinion that the History of Tamworth F.C. does not need to exist separately from the Tamworth F.C. page, unless it is greatly expanded and covers more of the club's pre-1989 history (which is something that I started adding to the main club page). Two other users have, at time of writing, agreed with me that a merger is a good idea (see Talk:Tamworth_F.C.) I removed the pictures as this is not a layout seen in any other team page I've come across (e.g. former featured article Manchester City F.C.) and seemed cluttered to me. Thank you, Stew Jones, for the insulting comments. Dancarney 09:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thats quite alright and if you require any more unwelcome comments then you come to me, me old china ;) Stew jones 23:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ohia-fantasma-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ohia-fantasma-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SC037.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SC037.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Each One Teach One.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Each One Teach One.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Bridge Road

Apologies for removing the second unreferenced tag; I thought it was referring to the "open in time for the game against Exeter" section. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Regarding the reference to the Rec End, there is evidence to suggest that it is called by that name by supporters, but only on forums... пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I was more concerned that the statement read that it was called the Rec End "for obvious reasons". Didn't seem obvious to me. No worries about the tag removal, I thought it was just a slip-up. I'm glad that you're doing some constructive editing work on this (and also for Histon F.C.) as one user just simply undoes anything I do to any Histon F.C. article. I have to go through a long discussion with them over any small change, which is very tedious. Dancarney (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm guessing you are referring to the same editor that did a blind revert on the Bridge Road article earlier today. I've questioned them on their talk page. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Yep. He's just done it again on my changes to Histon F.C.. It's pretty tiresome that he just undoes rather than does any constructive editing. Dancarney (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oneida Secretwars.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oneida Secretwars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oneida the wedding.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oneida the wedding.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

School ratings

Congratulations on your work removing the school ratings in town articles. The ratings are certainly off-topic! Well done, and thanks for your efforts - Adrian Pingstone (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hear, hear. I spotted your edit to Gloucestershire and I have to say I think your changes make Wikipedia look far more like a credible encyclopaedia. Behind The Wall Of Sleep (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mec-trails.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mec-trails.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Complete Guide to Insufficiency.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Complete Guide to Insufficiency.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Population of places in Suffolk

You could use this document produced by the County Council, which gives populations for parishes in the county in 2005. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Notontop.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Notontop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oneida Secretwars.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Oneida Secretwars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nechisar.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nechisar.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 Olympics torch rally image

The caption is being discussed in the talk page. Feel free to join and voice your opinions. My take is that analysis of a video source is not original research - it is simply the comprehension of a source, much like reading an article is not original research. Herunar (talk) 12:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.