Talk:Dannii Minogue discography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page. |
| B | This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale. |
 To-do list for Dannii Minogue discography: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|
|
|
 |
Dannii Minogue discography was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: May 17, 2007 |
[edit] Albums & Single charts
I am in the middle of adding details and difference between the albums. I should finish it by the end of the 23, but I will need to change the albums layout.
Secondly would any one mind if I added a key to the singles charts explaining that some chart positions or unknown or it is unknown if a single was released. Ie disremeberance was released in Japan, but no one knows it chart position.sailor iain 00:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Personally I would not include promo albums or remix albums under the Studio albums headings. Also many of the differences can be placed in the article about the album. The discography article is meant to be an overview of all of Minogue's releases. -- Underneath-it-All 00:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UK and European singles and album
just for future reference, Most european countries will have an individual release, their may also be a European single or albums are normally different.sailor iain 21:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Review
I am failing this because I don't think it is an article, but that it is more of a list. I would encourage you to take this to this to Good Article Review [1]where other people can discuss whether an article like this does indeed qualify, as my opinion may not be shared by others. Zeus1234 04:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
