Talk:Danielle Koenig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

[edit] Merge suggestion

If you want my opinion, I think that this article should be merged with the article about game show announcer Don Pardo. Don Pardo is Danielle Koenig's father-in-law (Danielle's husband is comic Jimmy Pardo, Don's son). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.91.54.10 (talk) 23:35, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Don is not Jimmy's father. -- Gridlock Joe 00:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Don is not Jimmy's father, to reiterate Gridlock's assertion. Even so, wouldn't it make more sense to merge Danielle with Jimmy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.16.3 (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow!

Haven't you guys heard? The woman's lib says chicks can wear pants, leave the bras at home, and even have their own Wiki entries now. But speaking of mergers, someone should definitely merge this this discussion with the Chauvinism page, under 'example of.' Poinete, ede ede; tachu tachu! (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

This merge suggestion makes no sense whatsoever. Danielle Koenig is a well known comedian. Why should she be a footnote on an article about a talk show host, or another comedian who isn't more famous than her? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.181.76.87 (talk) 08:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Merge Failed

I'm taking down the merge suggestion. The proposal has been active for some time now and those who have responded do not seem to be in favor of a merger. Naufana : talk 22:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)