Talk:Daniel Vickerman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Rugby union Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union. This project provides a central approach to rugby union-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing Daniel Vickerman, and help us assess and improve articles to good and featured standards, or visit the project page, where you can join and view the list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Portal	Daniel Vickerman is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Clarification

he is Australia's tallest rugby union player -- what is this supposed to mean?

• Is he the tallest Australian to play rugby union at the moment (which seems like hogwash)
• or is he the tallest member of the Australian National Team (which seems more likely)

Either way, there is no source specificed. Unless someone can clarify, I'll remove these remarks. -- Chris Lester ^talk 20:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Start rating

This article has been rated as start to make it consistent with the rugby classification. It needs work on the sourcing. Capitalistroadster 10:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)