Talk:Daniel Letterle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Cleanup

I do admit I'm somewhat of a newbie as far as actually editing content on Wikipedia, but I'm familiar enough with the site to know that this page was a mess. I did these edits in keeping with Wikipedia's "Good Faith" standard and tagged it with a "Clean-Up" banner in hopes that someone 1) more experienced with Wikipedia and 2) more knowledgeable about Mr. Letterle can contribute. That said, I feel the sub-par quality of this page as I found it, a complete lack of source citation (especially in regard to the "Trivia" section) and the choice to boldface the entry om its entirety (assuming it wasn't a typo by a newbie Wiki user) leads me to the personal conclusion that this is a Vanity Article written by Letterle or a party close to him (agent, PR rep, etc.). Just my opinion, which is why I took the issue here. FuturePresent 19:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I've added plentiful reference citations, but would love to see the number of reliable sources continue to be increased in the article. --Willscrlt (Talk) 16:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)