Talk:Dangerous (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Michael Jackson WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Michael Jackson and associated groups or individuals. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Contents

[edit] Actual U.S Sales

According to the RIAA, Dangerous has shipped 7 million copies in total throughout the United States. Of those 7 million shipments according to Nielsen Soundscan, 5.8 million have been sold over-the-counter. Therefore I have made some revisions to the sales table on this page.

[edit] chart trajectory

why do vandals continue to remove chart trajectory????? I find it offensive that only Michael Jackson is targetted in this vandalism of album pages. please stop it and I implore everyone to fight these vandals. --121.208.67.44 11:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

It's not vandals; it's policy. see WP:MUSIC/CHARTS#Chart_trajectories--AshadeofgreyTalk 11:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Soundscan data

I have removed the data surrounding the 9m in sales inclusive of Soundscan and World Music Club. Reasoning is as follows - that Soundscan covers all RIAA certification sales, these are not additional. Refer also [1] which gives a weeks data from Soundscan for MJ sales - and when he was having in increase in sales. 500 units for Dangerous for the week, 200 the previous week. Even if you take the higher figure and say he managed this for the full 7 years since last creditation, this comes to 200,000 units total. I know it's speculation, but the figure isn't even close to 2 million. World Club sales may double this, but still 0.4 million only. Others have estimated 0.5 million, and this certainly seems more correct. 60.234.242.196 10:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] nirvana

Nirvana's initial success in the mainstream was punctuated by the fact that they knocked this album out of the #1 spot -- why no mention? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.68.67 (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Michaeljacksondangerous.jpg

Image:Michaeljacksondangerous.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)