Talk:Dan Crow (computers)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Contents 1 Article Deletion 2 Year of Birth 3 What is the point? 4 Because He's a Wikipedia Admin 5 I vote for deletion 6 I, Too, Vote for Deletion

[edit] Article Deletion

This page is not notable. LFiveZeroFive (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Year of Birth

Dan, if you see this, can you publish your year of birth somewhere that we can reference? Your own blog would be fine, or maybe you can ask Vanessa Fox or Matt Cutts to let you make a guest appearance. Jehochman (^talk/_contrib) 15:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is the point?

What is the point of this page? Can any data analyst/programmer at any tech company have a bio page? The existence of this page suggests that this person is much more important than they are in reality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.133.34 (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Because He's a Wikipedia Admin

If he weren't an admin on this site, this page would have been deleted within hours of its posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.166.151 (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I vote for deletion

He did not provide sources to back the notability criteria of wikipedia - J.Aldo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.70.61.49 (talk) 03:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I, Too, Vote for Deletion

The existence of this 'article' smacks of favortism. I do not want to get involved in any personal attacks, but I must ask, why does this page exist? It is clear that it continues to escape deletion only becasue of the subject's status as a Wikipedia admin. I'm sorry, but what's good for the goose has to be good for the gander. This admin has deleted myriad pages of subjects more notable than this programmer. This page must be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.196.203 (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)