Dangerous Dogs Act 1991

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acts of Parliament of predecessor states to the United Kingdom

Acts of English Parliament to 1601 Acts of English Parliament to 1641 Ordinances and Acts (War & Interregnum) to 1660 Acts of English Parliament to 1699 Acts of English Parliament to 1706 Acts of Parliament of Scotland Acts of Irish Parliament to 1700 Acts of Irish Parliament to 1800

Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom

1707–1719 | 1720–1739 | 1740–1759 1760–1779 | 1780–1800 | 1801–1819 1820–1839 | 1840–1859 | 1860–1879 1880–1899 | 1900–1919 | 1920–1939 1940–1959 | 1960–1979 | 1980–1999 2000–Present

Acts of the Scottish Parliament

Acts of the Northern Ireland Parliament

Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly

Measures of the National Assembly for Wales

Orders in Council for Northern Ireland

United Kingdom Statutory Instruments

The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is a piece of UK legislation that was introduced in response to various incidents of serious injury or death resulting from attacks by aggressive and uncontrolled dogs, particularly on children. These incidents received heavy tabloid attention, causing widespread public concern over the keeping of dangerous dogs and a resulting legislative response.

Contents 1 The effect of the Act 2 The Index of Exempted Dogs 3 Case law 4 Criticism of the Act 5 Comparable legislation outside the UK 6 See also 7 References 8 External links

[edit] The effect of the Act

Under the 1991 Act (and as amended in 1997) it is illegal to own any Specially Controlled Dogs without specific exemption from a court. The dogs have to be muzzled and kept on a leash in public, they must be registered and insured, neutered, tattooed and receive microchip implants. The Act also bans the breeding, sale and exchange of these dogs, even if they are on the Index of Exempted Dogs.^[1]

Four types in particular were identified by the Act:

• Pit Bull Terrier (a description which has led to some confusion, as the "Pit bull" is not a breed in and of itself but encompasses a range of breeds)
• Japanese Tosa
• Dogo Argentino
• Fila Brasileiro

The Act also cover cross breeds of the above four types of dog. Dangerous dogs are classified by 'type', not by breed label. This means that whether a dog is prohibited under the Act will depend on a judgement about its physical characteristics, and whether they match the description of a prohibited 'type'. This assessment of the physical characteristics is made by a court.

[edit] The Index of Exempted Dogs

The Index of Exempted Dogs is maintained by the Animal Welfare section of DEFRA, the UK government department which administers the registration of Specially Controlled Dogs in England and Wales.

In 1991 and 1992 details of all Specially Controlled Dogs and their owners and keepers had to be added to the Index of Exempted Dogs. From early 1992 to 1997 no dogs were allowed to be added to the Index. In 1997 The Dangerous Dogs (Amendment) Act 1997 was passed which made some changes.^[2] From 1997 any Court was able to order that a specific dog be added to the Index by the issue of a Court Order.

Under the 1991 Act as amended it remains illegal to own any of these dogs without specific exemption from a court. The dogs have to be muzzled and kept on a leash in public, they must be registered and insured, neutered, tattooed and receive microchip implants.^[3]

[edit] Case law

There have been several test cases of the Act, most famously Dempsey (a pit bull terrier) who in 1995 was finally reprieved from a destruction order, to widespread media attention. The definition of the word "type" in the legislation was of particular controversy, as was the lack of discretion that the Act gives magistrates.

[edit] Criticism of the Act

The Act has been described as a piece of rushed legislation^[4] which was an overreaction to a transient public mood^[5]. The Act is sometimes cited as an unfavourable example of such legislation^[6], and in January 2007 was included in public responses to a BBC Radio 4 poll of unpopular UK legislation.^[7]

[edit] Comparable legislation outside the UK

Many other countries also have laws pertaining to dangerous dogs. These vary in severity. In some jurisdictions in Australia dogs which have been declared dangerous are required to wear a collar of red and yellow stripes; under the legislation of some municipalities of Queensland, such dogs are seized and destroyed. In some local government areas restrictions are very carefully spelt out.^[8]

[edit] See also

• Breed-specific legislation
• Dog attack

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Text of the Act
• BBC Article on a dog attack - July 2005
• BBC Article on a dog attack - January 2007
• BBC Article "How do you fend off a dangerous dog?"
• BBC Article: Dangerous Dogs Act included in poll of unpopular laws
• Deed Not Breed UK Campaign fighting the addition of any new breed to the DDA.
• Stop Dog Attacks
• Rover's Law - Megan's Law for Bad Dogs
• Information, Education, Advice & Support for dog owners in the UK, against breed specific legislation.