User talk:Damplips

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Damplips (talk • contribs • block log ^auto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Elladog.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

1 Speedy deletion of "Rincon Market"
2 How to block other users
3 Vandalism
4 June 2008

Speedy deletion of "Rincon Market"

A page you created, Rincon Market, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or organization, but does not indicate why it is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

How to block other users

I've lately seen users making vandalist edits. I would like to know how to block users.

Only administrators can block editors, though if you see a vandal feel free to report it to the administrator's vandalism page, where they can block the user, but be sure to give the user warnings first. Only administrators can delete pages, SteveCrossin simply tagged yours as needing deletion, as that article did not meet wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. This was not vandalism.--Phoenix -wiki 22:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

In response to:

Your recent edits to Template: KidsTVBlocksUS constituted vandalism. If it continues you'll be blocked from editing wikipedia.

please read WP:VAND#NOT and WP:AGF because my edits were not disruptive in any way, shape or form. Storm05 (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User_talk:Steve_Crossin has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Steve is an administrator properly nominating articles for speedy deletion that do not meet Wikipedia policies. If you continue this behavior, you will be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 19:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Your contribution history looks suspiciously like that of Elladog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). You've assumed ownership of {{KidsTVBlocksUS}} and demonstrated an inordinate interest in defunct department stores. That in itself isn't blockable, but since you've been blocked as Elladog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and since you've come back with numerous sockpuppets to continue your threats against FisherQueen (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights) and others, it's clear that your disruptive behavior hasn't subsided. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 19:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm not a sockpuppet of User: Elladog"

Decline reason: "You again? Would you please just stop? Now comes the rest of the pattern- you claim not to be Elladog, not realizing how very obvious your identity is. You request unblock a few times, and are declined by everyone. Then you make the death threats, after which your talk page is protected. Would you like me to skip to the end and just protect the talk page now, to save you the trouble of telling me you're going to murder me? Can you give us an estimate on how long you're going to keep doing this before you get bored and find a more interesting hobby? — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

What makes you think I'm a sockpuppet of User: Elladog?

We don't really feel like going through all the steps, and it doesn't sound like you have anything new to say, so I'll just say my usual line, which is: Please stop creating new accounts and move on with your life outside of Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)