User talk:Dam!ta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:Dam!ta/Archive1 User talk:Dam!ta/Archive2 User talk:Dam!ta/Archive3 User talk:Dam!ta/Archive4

[edit] Your edits on Janet Jackson

Hi please dont remove sourced information from the article because you dont agree with it. If you think its worth disputing add your own your own sources along side it and the reader can make the decision. Yours Realist2 (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not about "fairness" it is about accuracy and verifiability. The RIAA is a reputable source which deals with certified album sales, not necessarily gross album sales. In addition to the fact that all relevant information to Janet's career are currently presented in the article in a balanced manor to avoid WP:POV. I personally adore Janet Jackson, but this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site, nor her offical web page. When editing, you must have the attitude of a journalist, nor a fan.Bookkeeperoftheoccult (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to JJ

Some of your resent edits to the JJ article are breaching our Neutral POV policy at wikipedia. Your last edit in my humble opionion breached this NPOV and so should be altered or removed. I will leave it to you to correct or myself of other users will instead. Realist2 (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JJ wikiproject

See the Janet Jackson talk page about a JJ project. Cheers. --Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 23:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)